Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 3 – A petition calling
for a ban on the operations of the Moscow Patriarchate on Ukrainian territory highlights
in the religious sphere a dilemma Ukrainians face elsewhere as well: If Kyiv moves
to protect itself, it will be criticized for violating human rights; if it
doesn’t, it may be allowing Moscow institutions to continue subverting Ukraine.
Last week, Ukrainian activists who
identify themselves as the Initiative Group of Orthodox Believers in Ukraine
began collecting signatures on petitions to the Verkhovna Rada to ban the
Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate on the territory of Ukraine
(joinfo.ua/sociaty/929911_Nachalsya-sbor-podpisey-zapret-UPTs-MP.html).
The group’s appeal, the text of which
Joinfo.ua has not provided, said that the ban was necessary because “there is
no place on our land for criminals and occupiers.”
Such negative attitudes toward the
Moscow Patriarchate “toward any sources of imperial ambitions from Russia are
nothing new,” the Russian religious affairs portal, Reliopolis.org commented,
but it added that “such a sharp expression of antipathy” to the Moscow Church does
not correspond “to Ukraine’s declared commitment to freedom of conscience and
belief.”
The Ukrainian parliament is thus
likely to reject the petition, the portal continued, “since in the civilized world
such cases can be resolved only in the courts. Moreover, it pointed out, this
appeal is likely to provoke supporters of the Moscow Patriarchate to respond
with petitions of their own (religiopolis.org/news/7765-argumenty-neterpimosti.html).
Indeed, the situation regarding the
various Orthodox Churches in Ukraine is so murky that it is even entirely possible
that the petition now being circulated is a provocation by the Russian side to
embarrass Ukraine and to force Kyiv to slow the process of the formation of a
single Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
That process is very much ongoing
with some hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate
in Ukraine having declared their support for Ukraine against Russian
secessionist actions and some of the priests of that denomination already transferred
their allegiance to one or another of the Ukrainian Orthodox groups.
As many in the Orthodox world are
aware, the Moscow Patriarchate may be the biggest loser as a result of the
Kremlin’s Anschluss of Crimea and subversion of eastern Ukraine. Almost half of
all its parishes are in Ukraine, and the absorption of many or all of them in a
single autocephalous Ukrainian church would reduce the Moscow body’s influence
in two ways.
On the one hand, it would reduce the
ROC MP’s size and income, depriving it of its predominant position in Eastern
Christianity especially on the territory of the former Soviet Union. And on the
other, the formation of a consolidated Ukraine ROC would likely trigger a “parade
of sovereignties” among Orthodox groups elsewhere.
That would strengthen the statehood
of countries where the Orthodox form a majority of the population and reduce the
threat that the Moscow Patriarchate would interfere. And perhaps even more immediately important,
it would mean that Patriarch Kirill’s stock in the halls of the Kremlin would
fall precipitously because he would no longer be able to offer as much.
No comments:
Post a Comment