Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 6 – Of the slightly
more 3,000 media outlets in Crimea before the Anschluss, the Russian occupation
authorities have reregistered and therefore allowed to continue to operate only
232. Hardest hit have been those in Crimean Tatar, there, the Russian officials
have closed 11 out of 12.
Of the 232 with official permission
to operate, the Russian government says, eight are Internet portals, 19 are TV
channels, 42 are radio channels, 163 are print outlets and information
agencies. Two hundred and seven had been registered by Ukrainian officials
before the Anschluss, and 25 are Russian outlets which have moved in since that
time.
In reporting this in today’s “Novyye
izvestiya,” Yekaterina Dyatlovskaya notes that rights activists have already
labelled these closures as “the de facto destruction of independent Crimean
media” and a return to a Bolshevik approach to dealing with opposition news
outlets (newizv.ru/politics/2015-04-06/217688-kto-ne-s-nami.html).
The Committee for the Support of
Independent Crimean Tatar Media issued a public appeal to Russian society
calling on it to “do everything possible for the support of independent media.” Mikhail Fedotov, head of the Russian Human
Rights Council, has appealed to Russian government offices to allow more
outlets in Crimea to operate.
But Nikolay Svanidze, head of the
Council’s working group on this issue, says that “at present, we cannot do
anything more,” except to follow developments, adding that he doesn’t expect a
favorable change given the comments Vladimir Putin’s press secretary Dmitry
Peskov has made.
Moreover, senior Russian officials
are digging in on this point. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has declared that “no
problems will arise with media registration” in Crimea as long as applicants
follow Russian law, and Crimean head Sergey Aksyonov says that alternatives to
Crimean Tatar ATR television will be created.
Svanidze says that “unfortunately,
there are very serious problems in Crimea, especially with Crimean Tatar media.
To a certain extent, they reflect the status of media as a whole throughout the
country, but in Crimean the situation is still harsher.” Creating officially
controlled media doesn’t serve anyone’s purposes, he says, “except” those of the
authorities.
And Aleksey Simonov, president of
the Glasnost Defense Foundation, adds that “the problem with freedom of speech
in Crimea is absolutely the same as in the entire country” and recalls what
happened after the Bolsheviks took power. Lenin’s party closed all the
newspapers according to the principle “he who is not with us is against us.”
No comments:
Post a Comment