Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 2 – Since the rise of
Vladimir Putin, hundreds of Russians have emigrated to escape persecution and
to seek a better life. Ironically, the easiest destination for them to reach is
Ukraine, a country to which they can go without a Shengen visa or foreign
passport and in which despite many problems they are finding a new home.
Yuliya Arkhipova, one of the coordinators
of EmigRussia (emigrussia.org/) who now lives in Ukraine and works to help other
Russians settle there, says that even though “the crystallization of a
[Russian] political emigration [there] is only beginning,” its importance and some
of its main outlines are already visible (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=57755BFF45E4B).
A decade ago, most of the Russians
who fled to Ukraine were members of groups like the National Bolshevik Party
which was persecuted in Russia. Now “hundreds of citizens of Russia” are
arriving in Ukraine after leaving their homeland “for political reasons” that
range across the entire political spectrum but who don’t support the Kremlin’s “anti-Ukrainian
course.”
Having moved to Ukraine herself,
Arkhipova says that she came into contact with other Russian political emigres
and “understood that not all of them had found a place as easily as she,” given
that they lacked her Ukrainian roots and experience. And consequently she decided to form a group
that could help those who can no longer live in Putin’s Russia.
“We do not encourage people to
immediately throw over everything and move,” she says. “This question is a very
personal one. Our task is to explain to activists faced with a choice of ‘fleeing
or sitting in prison’ just what a move to Ukraine involves. We live in Ukraine and can explain the
procedures” they will have to follow.
One of the reasons Ukraine is so
important in this regard and why the Russian political emigration there is
large and growing, Arkhipova says, is that “Ukraine is the only place to which,
without having an open Shengen visa or foreign passport, it is possible to move
from Russia immediately.”
Exactly how many Russian political
emigres there are in Ukraine is impossible to know. On the one hand, she says,
many who have come from Russia to Ukraine have not made contact with her
organization. And on the other, some Russians who have come may not be
political emigres but in fact fleeing from criminal prosecution for
non-political acts.
Moreover, by her estimate, “no more
than 10 percent” of Russians who apply for permanent resident status get it,
and then only after a long period of legal indeterminacy and difficulties
finding work. Even those who receive that status rather than full asylum are
not necessarily protected against extradition if Moscow demands it.
Not surprisingly, Arkhipova points
out, many Ukrainians are cautious about such Russians, even though many of the
Russians involved expect more given that they have “spoken out in Russian for
the territorial sovereignty of Ukraine.”
As repression in Russia increases,
she suggests, the number of Russians seeking asylum in Ukraine will increase as
well. For those under threat, there is no good reason to remain in Russia. And she dismisses the arguments of those who
say that people who flee are weakening the opposition movement.
Indeed, Arkhipova says, there are
important reasons to view political emigration as “a school” for training
future leaders in Russia itself. Not only are there various ways to influence
Russia from the outside but the experience of how other countries and their
governments behave is instructive to Russians.
In Ukraine, “there is no
three-meter-tall wall between the people and the nominal elite.” Members of
both often come into contact with each other because “Ukraine is Ukraine and
Russia is Russia. Thus, to speak about a Maidan in Moscow is the same to speak
about a Kremlin in Kyiv.”
“In Moscow, there is no Maidan, but
in Kyiv, there is no Kremlin.”
If and when political change comes
to Russia, Arkhipova concludes, it will not come via a Ukrainian scenario. That
may not even be desirable because “victory achieved by blood will not be a
victory.” But a new generation, one
partly growing up outside of Russia, may play a valuable role in bringing
change to its homeland.
No comments:
Post a Comment