Staunton, December 1 – Russia’s
greatest misfortune is that it is ruled today by Vladimir Putin and his
“nomenklatura class of adventurers” and that under current conditions, there is
no chance that it will be able to get out from under that group anytime soon,
according to Moscow commentator Denis Bystrov.
This term, he suggests, raises many
questions. “What is a nomenklatura? Why doe sit form a class? And finally why
in the nomenklatura have appeared adventurists?” The answers, he suggest
reflect the transformation of the Soviet nomenklatura into the Russian
nomenklatura in the 1990s (rufabula.com/articles/2016/12/01/adventurers-class).
Drawing on the
works of Milovan Djilas and Michael Voslensky, Bystrov observes that “the
nomenklatura is an exploitive social organism which ruled in the society of the
Soviet Union and later in Russia?” It is a class because “it is a group of
people” which controls the flow of goods and services to itself. And it is consists
of “adventurists” because that is what those on top want.
In 1991, “the nomenklatura died
together with the socialist Soviet Union,” he writes, “and the nomenklatura was
instantly reborn in the new capitalist Russia,” mostly made up of the same
people who had been part of it before but with fewer constraints on their
control of wealth or ability to act.
The existence of a nomenklatura is
incompatible with democracy: it does everything it can to subvert democratic
forms. But in order not to provoke the population into revolt, Bystrov says,
the new Russian nomenklatura makes use of democratic forms but drains them of
all meaning to prevent them from being used to put pressure on the elites.
Putin has made this new class
increasingly into his obedient servants but only at the price of making the class
ever more an enemy of the population as a whole. Indeed, the Moscow commentator
says, “the fundamental problem of [Russia today] is the presence in its social
structure of a nomenklatura class.”
It doesn’t matter how many other
classes there are, he continues, and it doesn’t matter how many of them remain
even after successful reforms. But there will only be real progress if as a
result, the nomenklatura class is not among them. Achieving that isn’t easy, he argues, because
this class knows how to defend and reincarnate itself regardless of the social
system.
The only way to break it, Bystrov
suggests, is by inviting internationally-recognized professionals to identify
those who should be appointed to key posts. Otherwise, he concludes sadly, it
will be “impossible” to get rid of the nomenklatura as the events of the 1930s
and now show. Given that such a
commission is probably unthinkable, the future is bleak indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment