Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 5 – Alpha Bank’s
announcement that it won’t serve Russian defense companies because it does not
want to take the risk of falling under Western sanctions (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2018/01/to-protect-itself-moscow-bank-wont.html)
is calling attention to another way sanctions are affecting the behavior of
Russian banks.
As Novyye izvestiya reports today, despite the annexation of Crimea “almost
four years ago, the largest financial structures of [Russia] and not only they
as before are refusing to work there out of fear of sanctions” (newizv.ru/news/politics/05-01-2018/korporatsii-i-banki-rossii-vse-esche-ne-schitayut-krym-nashim).
The paper reproduces a report in the
Red Elephant telegram channel (t.me/redzion/10676)
which points out however angry some Russians may be about Alpha Bank’s
statement, they should be equally concerned or even more so by the failure of
Russian government corporations and banks and also Russian sports organizations
to operate in Crimea.
“Sberbank, VTB and so on do not work
in Crimea in order not to fall under sanctions. The Russian football union also
has not admitted a single football club of Crimea in the Championship of Russia”
– and “all other [Russian] sports federations, from basketball to volleyball”
have done the same.
That raises the question, Red
Elephant says. “’Whose Crimea is it?’ And the honest answer is that judging by
the practice of state corporations and state banks, and sports federations as a
minimum it is not Russian. Such an answer obtains not because you are not a
patriot but because those are the facts.”
And this reflects something Russians
are typically unwilling to acknowledge. Within Russia, there are “two parallel
economies: the globalized and the autochthonian. The former is a financial donor of the First
World and a recipient of technology and cadres from it; the authochthonian
works inside Russia and with our friends, the other outcast nations like Syria,
North Korea, Iran, Sudan and Venezuela.”
No comments:
Post a Comment