Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 13 – This week, Ingermanlanders
and their supporters marked the centenary of the declaration of independence of
the North Ingria Republic in July 1919 (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2019/07/a-new-aspirant-to-be-fourth-baltic.html).
That was to be expected, but something that was not occurred today.
In Moscow’s influential Kommersant
newspaper, Aleksey Alekseyev, that paper’s political observer, published a
2300-word article providing a sympathetic portrait of the North Ingria Republic
and suggested that much of the support it garnered was the result of ham-handed
repression by the Bolsheviks at the time (kommersant.ru/doc/4031239).
But perhaps more intriguing that the
paper’s willingness to attract broad attention to an event 100 years ago few
had ever heard of, Alekseyev’s article is striking because of what it says
about Soviet policy after the Bolsheviks suppressed the North Ingria Republic
and its final words about that political project.
“Soviet power viewed the Ingermanlanders
as an unreliable element. In the 1930s and 1940s, this people experienced five
waves of repression. They were dispatched to the Kola Peninsula in Siberia,
Central Asia and Kazakhstan. They were deported as ‘kulaks,’ ‘anti-Soviet elements,’
‘residents of border districts,’ ‘socially dangerous, ‘earlier resettled by
German occupiers in Finland,’ and ‘illegally returned to Leningrad oblast.’”
“In 1937-1938,” Alekseyev says, “all
Finnish institutions were closed, all aspects of national autonomy were
suppressed, instruction, radio broadcasting and print media in Finnish were all
prohibited. According to statistics offered by Leonid Gildi in his book, The Fate
of ‘a Socially Dangerous’ People (in Russian, Moscow, 2003), almost half of the
Ingermanlanders died from Stalinist repressions – 65,000 people.” Other scholars
give somewhat lower numbers.
“The territory adjoining the Finnish
border was completely cleansed of the local population before the Soviet-Finnish
war. And the history of the Republic of North Ingria for many decades was not
acceptable for recollection either in the USSR or in Finland. But all the same
it was, both the republic and its history.”
No comments:
Post a Comment