Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 4 – Boris Chernyshov,
vice chairman of the Duma’s education committee, is proposing to create a new
tax category, “the victims of perestroika,” because “many residents of the USSR
suffered a humanitarian and geopolitical catastrophe as a result of radical
changes in the country” (forum-msk.org/material/politic/15970651.html).
This populist proposal is unlikely to
go anywhere or do anything besides attract attention to Chernyshov, but it is interesting
and indicative nonetheless. On the one hand, it reflects the views of Vladimir
Putin who has often talked about the end of the Soviet Union as the greatest
geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century.
And on the other, it speaks volumes
about a political system where a deputy could seriously propose giving benefits
to victims of that period without talking about giving benefits to victims of
other periods, be they those of the Stalin era or those of the Yeltsin and
Putin eras since 1991.
Indeed, some commentators, including
Svetlana Gomzikova of Svobodnaya pressa, are already suggesting that the
Russian parliament should be thinking about extending benefits not just to “victims”
of that period but to those citizens who have suffered during all of them (svpressa.ru/society/article/245330/).
To the extent that others begin to
think along the same lines, a proposal designed to reinforce Putin’s views about
the end of Soviet times may have the unintended consequence of opening or
reopening discussions about other periods, a development the Kremlin may not
welcome if it cannot control the participants.
No comments:
Post a Comment