Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 1 – Moscow’s
ethnic cafes have long been recognized as centers of community life for the
gastarbeiters in the Russian capital, but now two sociologists have
investigated them in detail and found that there are five distinct types of “community
clusters” that such cafes support.
Yevgeny Varshaver of the Higher
School of Economics and Anna Rochev of the Institute of Sociology studied 80
cafes, interviewed 200 of their owners and customers, and observed interactions
in these cafes for approximately 120 hours. On Friday, they posted their
findings online (opec.ru/text/1600313.html and nazaccent.ru/content/9875-uchenye-issledovali-migrantov-v-moskve-cherez.html).
They distinguished five different
kinds of ethnic café. The first include “Islamic poly-ethnic communities” in which
Muslim identity play the key role. Within this group, there is a major divide
between those cafes visited by Muslims from the Caucasus and those used by
Muslims from other regions and countries.
The second, Varshaver and Rochev
said, are those frequented by people from a particular place, such as Samara or
the Pamirs, and in which territorial identities are more important than ethnic
or religious. The third, which they call
“corporate,” are cafes near where migrants travel or work.
The fourth consists of cafes
frequented by representatives of Azerbaijani businesses who come together to
share information, hire workers and make deals.
And the fifth is the Kyrgyz society, a group that the researchers said
is not “a real community” because it is not based on personal ties but rather
residential patterns.
The two scholars present a detailed map of the cafes
they studied. They note that the cafes both reflect and help form a community
because their regular visitors are people who know one another and know the
owners and who thus use the cafes not simply as a source of food but “as a pace
for meetings, contacts, and links.”
“Among the employees” of the cafes,
Varshaver and Rochev say, are people who are “visibly” members of a particular
minority – that is, “people whose external features set them apart from those
of Slavic ethnic origin. Among the
visitors [to the cafes] also not less than half” are members of the
corresponding group.”
In issuing the report, Varshaver
stressed that these communities are informally organized without any strict
structure. But he said that in each of them there are people who enjoy “great
authority,” adding that “interacting with them in the course of the development
of migration policy undoubtedly could be useful.”
No comments:
Post a Comment