Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 14 – A declaration
by the Romanian defense minister that his country is concerned by the increased
Russian presence the Black Sea is encouraging Kyiv which welcomes such a
statement by a senior official of a NATO country as an indication that the
Western alliance is increasingly ready to stand with Ukraine against Russia.
In an Apostrophe commentary, Mikhail
Samus, deputy director of Kyiv’s Center for Research on the Army, Conversion,
and Disarmament, says that no one wants to see Moscow achieve “zones of
exclusive control” on that body of water (apostrophe.ua/article/politics/2018-10-14/morskaya-voyna-s-rossiey-u-ukrainyi-poyavilsya-novyiy-soyuznik/21298).
The analyst says
that Bucharest’s statement is welcome especially since “Ukraine finally has
begun actions which demonstrate that it has the very same rights to make use of
the Kerch Straits and the Sea of Azov as Russia.”
NATO of course has “limited
opportunities in this sphere” because the Montreux Convention limits its
ability to maintain forces in the Black Sea.
It must rotate them periodically and “now NATO is trying to create a
system” based in Constanza, Romania, that will allow it to be present for more
sustained periods, Samus says.
Unfortunately, not all NATO countries
are on board with this, he continues.
Sofia is refusing to support such an arrangement because it “considers
that this can lead to a greater confrontation” with Russia. For the time being,
Romania is “the most active member of NATO which is trying to stand up to Russia.”
For that reason, the Kyiv analyst
says, today, Romania “is in fact Ukraine’s closest ally on the Black Sea.” The
Ukrainian authorities need to “deepen their ties with Romania, including in
naval affairs” in order to be able to work with them and through them with other
NATO countries including the United States.
Ukraine also needs to denounce the
agreement it has with Russia on the Sea of Azov so that that body of water will
not be an inland sea controlled by Kyiv and Moscow but an international waterway
governed by Law of the Sea principles.
Ending that agreement is the only way to open the door to a NATO
presence in the Sea of Azov.
According to
Samus, Russia has only “limited” chances to achieve full control over the Black
and Azov seas “because any actions in that direction will be viewed by the
international community as a challenge and threat, and this will lead to new
sanctions against Russia. “He concludes that “this does not correspond now to the
interests of the Russian Federation.”
No comments:
Post a Comment