Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 5 – After almost 20
years of Russian lobbying, a subgroup of the UN Commission on the Limits of the
Continental Shelf has declared that much of the Arctic seabed is an extension
of Russia’s continental shelf. If that
is confirmed by the entire commission, Moscow’s claims to the Arctic will have gained
significant international recognition.
Russian officials are jubilant. Yevgeny Kiselyev, who heads the Russian
agency that oversees questions of natural resources and territorial
arrangements about them, told TASS that the decision was “extraordinarily important
for us” (tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/6290153).
If he is right that the full
commission will soon follow suit, that will mean that the UN will have given
new weight to Moscow's argument that its continental shelf extends under an
additional 1.2 million square kilometers in the Arctic. And that in turn
will give it a much stronger claim for controlling access to natural resources
and the passage of ships even far from its coastline.
Russian commentator Aleksandr
Dubrovsky is equally excited about the consequences. In an article entitled
“The Arctic is Returned Home,” he says that what the sub-commission has done
works to Moscow’s advantage even if the full committee eventually decides not
to include all the territory that the sub-commission has (iarex.ru/articles/65623.html).
“Already now,” Dubrovsky argues,
“independent of the final result, this event testifies to a triumph of Russian
fundamental science which has been capable of carrying out work” that no one
else could do and “the strategic thinking of the Russian authorities” about the
Arctic basin and how to struggle for it.
But Western experts say that the
Russian enthusiasm may be overstated: Michael Byers of the University of
British Columbia says that the UN commission is not in the business of defining
borders but rather ruling on the validity of geological data presented to it (thebarentsobserver.com/en/arctic/2019/04/russia-scores-scientific-point-quest-extended-arctic-continental-shelf).
That suggests the issue is far from
resolved, although there is one reason Moscow may have for thinking it has made
progress toward achieving its goal in this region. Defining the borders does come under the
international Law of the Sea Convention, something Moscow is a signatory to but
the US has not ratified.
Consequently, resistance to what
Russia hopes to get from this decision will have to be led by other countries
which may have more immediate interests in the Arctic but do not have the equivalent geopolitical clout,
especially after the decision by the sub-commission tilts the discussion in
Russia’s favor.
No comments:
Post a Comment