Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 3 – From the 1970s
to earlier this decade, Russian environmental activists focused on the
destructive impact of a cellulose plant on Lake Baikal. Indeed, in the last
decade, they have mobilized against Moscow’s backing of that plant and even
forced Vladimir Putin to back down on it.
(For background on that struggle,
see windowoneurasia.blogspot.com/2010/01/window-on-eurasia-putin-sacrifices.html,
windowoneurasia.blogspot.com/2010/03/window-on-eurasia-putins-paper-mill.html
and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2015/02/a-new-crisis-breaks-out-over-fate-of.html.)
Then, beginning in mid-2016, Russian
officials opened the way for China to bottle water from Baikal and possibly
even pump it into a pipeline for export to China (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2016/05/russian-minister-proposes-diverting.html),
moves that outraged many Russians.
Roughly a million of them signed a
petition against exporting Baikal’s waters to China and tens of thousands took
part in demonstrations against that idea in more than 50 cities in Russia and
around the world last month (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2019/03/nearly-million-russians-have-signed.html and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2019/03/tens-of-thousands-of-russians-in-more.html).
Those protests forced Russian
official to suspend construction of the bottling factory and put on hold talk
of a pipeline (newsland.com/community/7411/content/ostanovleno-stroitelstvo-kitaiskogo-zavoda-na-beregu-baikala/6683155
and themoscowtimes.com/2019/03/11/russian-prosecutors-seek-to-stop-chinese-bottling-factory-at-lake-baikal-a64771).
Russian anger at this idea even prompted
one Russian satirical site to suggest that residents of the Transbaikal should
throw trash in to the lake so that the Chinese would choke on water from the
lake (intersucks.ru/общество/zhiteli-irkutska-sbrasyivayut-v-baykal-nechistotyi-chtobyi-zashhitit-ozero-ot-kitaytsev/).
Now, however,
apparently convinced Russians are focusing on China rather than on them, Moscow
officials have announced plans to increase the concentration of dangerous
substances companies can dump into Lake Baikal by a factor of ten. Such a move
will leave the city “dead,” experts say (novayagazeta.ru/articles/2019/04/02/80074-proigraet-durak-more).
The natural resources ministry has
clearly miscalculated in assuming that Russians will support the kind of
economic growth such environmental degradation will entail. The reverse is almost
certainly the case, and those who protested against China’s plans are now
likely to do the same but this time against Moscow,
And that means the Kremlin, which
under Vladimir Putin has consistently backed economic development and profit at
the expense of the environment, has transformed the issue from one in which it
could position itself as a defender of Russian interests into a different one
in which it and not some foreign country is the enemy.
No comments:
Post a Comment