Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 9 – The creation of
even small federal territories around resort areas in the Caucasus mountains
and in the area around Sochi could easily trigger serious conflicts among regions
and republics and between various ethnic groups, Sergey Smirnov, the head of the
Applied Political Science Foundation says.
Nervousness about that possibility,
highlighted by the protests in Ingushetia after border changes with Chechnya,
has increased in the last few days following the approval of a constitutional
amendment putting federal territories at the same level as oblasts, krays and
republics, and promises to adopt a law implementing that soon (1tv.ru/news/2020-07-03/388787-tsentrizbirkom_nazval_itogi_golosovaniya_po_konstitutsii_legitimnymi_pravdivymi_i_besspornymi).
And those concerns have increased
over the last several days as Moscow officials have made it clear that they are
focusing on two places in particular, the Kavminvody resort complex and the
Sochi region along the Black Sea Coast. The first would cut into three federal
subjects, Stavropol Kray, Kabardino-Balkaria and Karachayevo-Cherkessia, all of
whom regard any border change as a threat.
The second might be even more
dangerous because it would exacerbate current conflicts between Russians and
the Circassians who regard that region as holy because it was from there that
tsarist forces expelled the Circassians in 1864. On just how serious this
conflict is, see jamestown.org/program/sochi-once-again-epicenter-of-russian-circassian-conflict-but-circassians-register-a-win/.
The idea of running these resort
areas from the center of the state goes back to tsarist times, Anton Chablin
reminds (akcent.site/novosti/8689 and akcent.site/mneniya/8695).
Alexander
I ran Kavminvody directly, and in 2010, the Foundation for Effective Politics
urged that arrangement be revived for the Sochi region.
That proposal built on the fact that
in 1993, Moscow gave Sochi the status of a resort of federal importance as part
of the center’s plans to develop it. Then, plans for the Olympiad overwhelmed such
ideas; but after the games, the city of Sochi found it couldn’t cope with the
facilities that had been built.
Ever since, and especially because Vladimir
Putin was so heavily invested psychologically in the Sochi Games, Russian
officials have been discussing the possibility of carving out some entity
around Sochi. Now, with the new amendment and likely adoption of an enabling
law, they see their chance.
These two “federal territories” would
be relatively small in terms of both territory and population, but even they
would be controversial, especially if Moscow goes ahead without careful
discussion with the local populations and all the stakeholders there, including
ethnic minorities.
If Moscow does go ahead with these
two projects, that move will not only exacerbate tensions in the two places but
cause other non-Russians to become even more fearful than they are today that
the Kremlin will use this new category against them even to the point of doing
away with the non-Russian republics.
Because of that possibility, too,
any move in Kavminvody or Sochi will lead to problems not only there but across
the Russian Federation. (On such possibilities and fears, see windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2020/07/amendment-allowing-for-federal.html
and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2020/07/federal-territories-amendment-threatens.html.)
No comments:
Post a Comment