Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 27 – The Chukchis, a
numerically small nation in the extreme far northeast of the Russian Federation
on the Bering Straits, have long been the object of Russian humor. Some “Chukchi
jokes,” as they are known, focus on the absurdities or problems of Soviet or
Russian life, but others make fun of the Chukchis and present them as backward
or worse.
Now, at a time of heightened ethnic
sensitivities and when Russian officials are moving against anyone they deem to
be russophobic, some Chukchis are taking an unusual step to fight back: they
are suing the compilers of a 1998 Russian dictionary for slandering their
nation (nazaccent.ru/content/11108-ekspert-nazval-isk-chukchej-k-sostavitelyam.html).
Aleksandr Lambin, who represents the
plaintiffs as president of the Foundation for the Defense of the Constitutional
Rights of the Numerically Small Indigenous Peoples of Russia, says that
dictionary compilers have a responsibility not to enshrine negative stereotypes
in the definitions they provide lest they suggest to user that such stereotypes
are justified.
It is infuriating that the scholars
who prepare dictionaries do not understand that they are not simply reporting
what people say and write but are implying intentionally or not that popular
usage of negative characterizations of people of different ethnic groups is so
widespread that it is acceptable.
The case will be held in a
Zamoskvoretsky court tomorrow, with the plaintiffs seeking not only an apology
but the removal of the dictionary from all libraries until corrections are made
In addition, they seek financial compensation for the “moral harm” that such
definitions of their nation has inflicted, but they insist that “this is not
the main thing.”
Russian officials and experts on the
other side are as dismissive of this case as they often are of the Chukchis and
other numerically small groups. Mikhail
Gorbanevsky, the head of the Guild of Linguistic Experts for Documentation and
Information Disputes, says that bringing suit against the compilers of a
dictionary is “an act of stupidity.”
Dictionary compilers are supposed to
gather information on how a language is actually used, he says, and if people
use words a certain way, that must be reflected in the definitions
provided. At the same time, he acknowledges
that dictionaries for school children should take into consideration moral
issues.
According to Gorbanevsky, slighting
references to one or another ethnic group are common not only in the Russian
Federation but around the world. But he points
out that “it is unknown who was the first to use the name of the
representatives of one of the peoples of the North in denigrating manner” and
that “alas, one can’t sue someone who is unknown.”
It is highly unlikely that the
Chukchis will win this case; indeed, it may be that the case itself will become
the subject of yet another of the hundreds of Russian “Chukchi jokes.” But the willingness of the Chukchis to bring
this case is a reflection not only of the spirit of the times but an indication
that the Chukchis are increasingly angry about how Russians treat them.
The case thus bears watching, even
if one again the Russians win and the Chukchis lose.
No comments:
Post a Comment