Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 11 – Eighty percent
of the nearly 200,000 foreigners studying in Russian higher educational
institutions are from the former Soviet republics, and Moscow has long assumed
that their time in Russia as students will lead many of them to remain there as
professionals or to return to their own countries as supporters of close ties
with Moscow.
But just as the rising tide of
xenophobia in Russian society has made an increasing share of immigrant workers
hostile to Russians and a base for anti-Moscow views in their countries on
their return home, so too expressions of hatred among Russians for outsiders
means that fewer of them are choosing to remain in Russia or to be pro-Russian
if they return home.
According to an article on “Russkaya
planeta” this week, “foreign students suffer from racism” while they are in the
Russian Federation, but Moscow still hopes to exploit them as a major
“intellectual resource” in the Russian workforce and as potential political
allies in their home countries (rusplt.ru/society/vyisshee-obrazovanie-pod-pressom-ksenofobii-9192.html).
The article, by Aleksey Alikin,
summarize the findings of a study prepared by Nadezha Radin, a professor at
Moscow’s Higher School of Economics and published separately at opec.ru/1691329.html. Despite its
attempt to be upbeat, that study and indeed the fact that it appeared at all
cannot be reassuring to the Kremlin.
According to Radin, foreign students
Russia fall into one of two groups: “The first are specialists who will return
home and continue to cooperate with us because they know Russian and are guided
by the Russian culture that is familiar to them.” The second includes those who
“want to study and work in Russia” rather than return home.
Most of the latter are from the
former Soviet republics of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.” They want to
remain in Russia, but “in this regard, xenophobia which destroys everything valuable
which the educated migrants have is unnecessary and [in fact] extremely dangerous.”
The Russian authorities recognize the
contribution such people can make, but “at the same time,” the study said, “ordinary
Russians are far from being as tolerant.” Attacks on foreign students by neo-Nazis
are “now rare,” but the passive xenophobia of local residents remains” and has
its affect.
In 2007-2008, there were a number of
cases in which foreign students were beaten or even killed, there were
xenophobic demonstrations at universities. And Russian students often made disparaging
and racist remarks about them. “Now the situation
is not as sharp,” Radkina says, but problems remain.
One of her findings is particularly
intriguing. Radkina notes that students in Russia from the US or the EU rarely
encounter xenophobia directed against themselves, but the image they have about
Russia is profoundly shaped by the bad experiences of foreign students from
Central Asia who are victims of xenophobic attitudes and attacks.
“American and European students,”
she says, “are very much concerned about human rights and issues of
discrimination.” And consequently, “if we want to attract them,” they must be
given the chance to discuss these things while in Russia, and “they must feel”
that democratic values are respected in Russia.
Svetlana Gannushkina, a Russian
human rights activist, told Alikin that in her experience, foreign students in
Russia “encounter xenophobia ‘daily.’”
They are attacked and denigrated, and in her view, in contrast to the
judgment of Radkina, “now we are seeing a deterioration of the situation.”
Natalya Yudina, an expert at the
SOVA Center, agreed with Gannushkina. “The
number of attacks on people with so-called non-Slavic visages is growing.”
There were more murders of such people in 2013 than in 2012. And because
foreign students experience this too, they “are correctly viewing xenophobia as
a threat to themselves.”
At the end of the first decade of
this century, Yudina says, the Russian authorities had suppressed the major
neo-Nazi groups and blocked the appearance of replacements. But “in the course of the last two years,
[the authorities] have focused their attention not on racist force but rather
on propaganda.”
And because suppressing a website is
easier than suppressing a neo-Nazi group and because the militia gets the same
statistical credit whether it does the one or the other, the SOVA expert says,
the authorities are doing less to counter actual racially organized violence
now and consequently, there is more of it, including against foreign students.
No comments:
Post a Comment