Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 20 – When Nikita
Khrushchev denounced Stalin in 1956, stories circulated that someone in the
audience of the 20th CPSU Congress shouted “where were you when all
this was going on?” and that many were asking themselves whether the charges
against Stalin did not raise questions about the entire Soviet leadership.
Something similar appears to be
going on now with the findings that Vyachesav Gayzer, now former head of the Komi
Republic, not only was guilty of extortion and other crimes but headed a
veritable criminal conspiracy and had been doing so for the last nine
years. If that is so, who else may be
getting away with such crimes? And what does that say about the Putin system?
That such questions are beginning to
arise in Russia is suggested by the comments today of Anatoly Baranov, the
editor of the communist Forum-MSK.org internet portal (forum-msk.org/material/news/10997228.html).
This latest scandal, he says, only
serves as confirmation of what he for the last 15 years has been deeply convinced is the case: “that the
very same thing is going on in any oblast or republic administration and at all
lower levels as well.” Finally, one of
those involved has been arrested,
but what’s next?
Having said “A,” Baranov continues, “it
is necessary to say ‘B’” and investigate “all the administrations of the subjects
of the federation and of the federal government as well.” But if that happens, “who will Vladimir
Vladimirovich [Putin] have left?”
Obviously, many senior officials are
worried because they know that there is an enormous amount of compromising materials
about them out there, some of it published, some of it not. And now they have to worry that this could
lead to the kind of criminal charges which would take not only their positions
but all their ill-gotten gains away from them.
Baranov says he just saw a French play in which French
tax inspectors were investigating the incomes of wealthy citizens, something “absolutely
unthinkable” in Russia. Were such
investigations to start, how would officials explain their villas and the other
attributes of their wealth?
No comments:
Post a Comment