Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 4 – No one ever
says Kyzyl or any other city or region in the Russian Federation is “ours” and
deserving of our attention, Dmitry Gudkov says, because the logic of “the
virtual empire” that Vladimir Putin has created not only means that Russians
are faced with a ever-changing list of “virtual enemies” but also that they
neglect what is already theirs.
In an article in “Moskovsky
komsomolets,” the opposition politician and commentator says that many Russians
do not know or have much concern for real places in their real country. They
don’t know where Kyzyl is – or in many cases, whether it is a city or something
else (mk.ru/politics/2016/01/02/ironiya-imperii-ili-kyzyl-nash.html).
That constitutes what he calls “the
irony of empire” given that Kyzyll and the Tyvan Republic of which it is the
capital is a real place and larger than Bulgaria, Hungary, Portugal, Austria,
the United Arab Emirates, or other places, like Crimea, that Russians do focus
on and talk about whether they are “ours” or not.
For the record, he points out,
Crimea occupies 28,000 square kilometers, but Tyva is six times larger with
168,000. Nonetheless, few Russians could
point to where it is on a map of their own country although few could not point
to where Crimea is.
Russians “precisely know … that
Russia is our powerful state and no less our great country, but as for details
about it, those are quite cloudy,” he writes.
If tomorrow Kyzyl and Tyva disappeared from the map, Moscow wouldn’t
react. On the other hand, the television woud continue to talk about Crimea.
“Alas,” Gudkov continues, “the logic
of a virtual empire is constructed differently. That which is already part of
it isn’t interesting.” The only question anyone cares about is “what’s
next?” And that is because it “can exist
only by expanding and swallowing up ever new space” and not necessarily real
space but virtual space as presented on television.
Such “a virtual empire has virtual
enemies and therefore they can be changed with such ease, transforming one into
the other and changing names and masks.” Yesterday, Russians focused on
Banderites in Ukraine; today on ISIS, and tomorrow, perhaps Turkish janissaries
or someone else.
“It is well know that Russia always
was friendly with Oceana. That is, forgive me, always its enemy. No, again
always its friend. And further according to the text left to us by the great
[George] Orwell.”
Gudkov says that his wish for the new
year is that Russians will leave the “virtual” empire in the past and focus on
their country, “our real Kyzyl, and also Lipetsk, Gorno-Altayshk, Birobidzhan,
Ukhta, Smolensk, Nizhny Novgorod, Mozhaysk, and the multitude of other real
cities whose fate no one except us is involved with.”
What Russians have benefitted from
the pursuit of virtual empire in Syria? Wouldn’t real Russian cities and towns
be better off with the money being spend on bombs falling into the desert? And
wouldn’t Russians be better off being proud and taking care of their own real
places rather than worrying always about others beyond their real borders?
“Of course, the virtual empire is
useful for its rulers, the very same people who when there is any attempt to
talk about the real problems of the country shout louder than all the rest ‘Catch
the thief!’” as a way of not doing anything real for the real Russia which very
much needs help from them and ordinary Russians as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment