Paul Goble
Staunton,
November 2 – Up to now, Russian society has preferred to keep its protests
peaceful, Valery Solovey says; but the re-emergence of conflicts between increasingly
distinct social classes may change that and make violence more common and thus a
greater problem for the powers that be.
In
a Facebook post, the MGIMO professor and commentator lists six reasons for his
disturbing conclusion (blog.newsru.com/article/02nov2018/conflikt):
First of all, he says, “the conflict
is reviving in the crudest and most open form, as the antagonism of a
privileged minority and the destruction of the rights of the increasingly impoverished
majority.”
Second, “national wealth via
government mechanisms is being redistributed in favor of an extremely small
minority,” with the majority largely left out as the minority openly pursues
the destruction of the social state on which Russians have long relied.
Third, Solovey continues, “the pension
reform became for society a signal that the supreme power {i.e., Vladimir
Putin] is no longer defending it” against the boyars.
Fourth, the various mechanisms for
dampening class conflict “have ceased to work. The situation of small and
mid-sized business is becoming worse, and the still small middle class is
contracting in size. Propaganda is no longer the anesthetic it was.
Fifth, changes in political
consciousness are leading to changes in political behavior, as the September
regional elections showed. “Up to now society prefers conventional and peaceful
means of protest.”
But sixth, the psychological
problems of individuals which led to the Kerch shooting and the attack on the FSB
office in Arkhangelsk could easily grow into mass phenomena because in each
case what drove these individuals to act is affecting far larger groups as
well.
No comments:
Post a Comment