Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 4 – Andrey Dynko, a
Belarusian commentator, has reminded the world of something many would like to
ignore: when a foreign state, in this case, Russia, bribes someone at or near
the top of a foreign country, as has happened in his country most recently,
this is more than bribery, it is subversion.
“What does it mean when the chief of
the security service of the country is working for another country?” the Nasha niva columnist asks. “It means
that that country has all, even the most delicate information, about the president”
and can use it against him and his country at will (nn.by/?c=ar&i=229962&lang=ru).
And that is the case even if the
money comes not from a foreign government directly but from a firm in a foreign
country that is controlled by or under the influence of that government. The consequences
are much the same, however much some in many countries seek to highlight the
difference.
What has happened in recent days is the
“logical” outcome of what has been going on in Belarus for a long time, Dynko
says. “For a long time under the present time, it wasn’t clear where Belarus
ended and where Russia began. An FSB officer became head of the KGB, there were
times when at the head of all force structures stood people who were not born
in Belarus.”
“Citizens were raised to think in a
similar way: ‘a Belarus is a Russian man. Belarus and Russia are a single hole.
Dependence on Russia is in fact independence,’” an Orwellian formulation if
there ever was one, on a par with “slavery is freedom.”
Much is being said about the 146,000
US dollars a Russian firm reportedly paid to a senior security officer close to
Alyaksandr Lukashenka and about the far larger sums that Russians of various
descriptions paid to the head of Belarus’s radio and television service. But
the fundamental reality is not the money but the control it brings.
No comments:
Post a Comment