Paul Goble
Staunton,
Oct. 19 – News reports about the current census have not only revealed the many
reasons why the numbers this time around won’t be entirely accurate –
widespread resistance during the pandemic, for example – but also ways in which
census takers in the past have manipulated data.
One
of the most intriguing given the distortions it introduced came during the 1989
census when Soviet officials, despite Gorbachev’s glasnost, decided they had to
find a way to hide just how many Soviet citizens were behind bars. According to
Samara sociologist Vladimir Zvonovsky, they came up with a simple means to do
so.
He
says that the Soviet census takers decided to reduce the ages of prisoners to
that of children and then include them in the local population (idelreal.org/a/31499672.html).
Because prisons and camps were not equally distributed across the country, that
distortion made it appear that some areas were seeing a baby boom when in fact
they were not.
That
distortion, of course, was compounded when researchers and officials used the
official data in comparison with earlier and later censuses where this means of
hiding the prison population was not employed, leading some areas to appear to
be in deeper demographic decline than they in fact were.
While
this may appear a small problem, it is in fact a large one, an indication that
the way in which officials try to hide unpleasant realities that a census
should show is not difficult for them to undertake and can have serious
consequences not only for analysts but also for political decision makers and
others who are certain to draw false conclusions from falsified data.
No comments:
Post a Comment