Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 23 – Seventy-two
years ago today, Stalin on the invented pretext
that Chechen and Ingush collectively collaborated with the German invaders deported
almost 500,000 men, women and children of those two Vainakh nations to wilds of
Central Asia, an event that continues to define the fate of both.
But while Chechens, Ingush and all
those who care about human rights will recall this event around the world,
there is one place where it won’t be marked: in Chechnya itself. There since
2011, Ramzan Kadyrov has blocked any commemoration lest it conflict with the
Russian holiday, the Day of the Defender of the Fatherland, and instead required
that Chechens in Chechnya mark a memorial day on May 10, the anniversary of the
death of his father.
Russian journalist Vladimir
Kara-Murza who did stories on the Chechens in the 1990s says that commemorating
February 23rd is “the only thing that can unite the people” of
Chechnya and thus Kadyrov’s ban on such measures and the arrest of those who
seek to remember this event is a horrific mistake (kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/278046/).
While there will not be any public
events in Chechnya, others are taking place elsewhere. In St. Petersburg last
night, there was a meeting devoted to the anniversary in the Akhmatova Museum.
The Chechen diaspora in Norway also has scheduled a session for today. And other groups of Chechens in Russia and
elsewhere are marking this event.
Naima Neflyasheva, a specialist on
the Caucasus at the Moscow Institute of Africa, says that Russia’s and
Chechnya’s decision to mark the Day of Defender of the Fatherland instead of to
commemorate the anniversary of the deportation is a mark of “a lack of respect
and a sacrilege.”
“We have a large multi-national
country, in the history of which there have been complicated and dramatic
periods. This requires a special delicacy, wisdom and responsibility of the
authorities in the setting of memorial dates and calendar holidays,” she says,
adding that “the calendar must work to integrate citizens” rather than to
divide them.
“It we live in one country, then we
must be glad together and grieve together,” she says. “The defenders of the Fatherland deserve to
have their own holiday, and in the calendar there are enough days to make a
choice, particularly as in the history of the Russian army there are many
worthy and significant events” worth remembering.
But marking that holiday in a way
that overshadows the anniversary of the deportation is wrong in a double sense.
On the one hand, she says, commemorating the deportation should never be
treated like a holiday. And on the other, acting as if the deportation never
happened or is unworthy of being remembered is “a sacrilege.”
Other Chechens and Ingush agree with
her. Among those Kavkaz-Uzel cites are Mairbek Vachagayev in Paris, Israpil
Shovkhalov in Moscow, and Akhmed Buzurtanov in Nazran. Said Muskhadzhiyev in Maikop says that what
is especially wrong is that the holiday Moscow has ordered has changed its name
so many times.
Abdulla Duduyev in Moscow says he is
certain that marking February 23rd as a holiday rather than as a
memorial day “deeply wounds people who are guilty of nothing” and that as for
himself, he “will not celebrate February 23” as Moscow and Grozny want because “this
is the day of the greatest and unprecedented tragedy of two peoples, the
Chechens and Ingush.”
No comments:
Post a Comment