Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 11 – During the Cold
War, officials in many Western capitals often remarked that “we send Moscow
diplomats and the Russians treat them like spies, while Moscow sends us spies
and we treat them like diplomats,” a reminder of the dangers inherent in either
set of assumptions or alternatively in not making them.
Two events this week – the tit-for-tat
fallout from a Russian attack on an American diplomat in Moscow and the
assumption in Ukraine that the Kremlin is using an ostensibly religious procession in Ukraine as a
cover for FSB penetration of that country – call attention to the return of
this Cold War meme and its dangers.
Vladimir Putin’s suspiciousness,
rooted in his KGB past, unfortunately means both that he views all Western
diplomats as spies or worse and that he thus feels completely free to behave in
that way with regard to others, confident that many in the West can be counted
on to dismiss such charges as relics of Cold War thinking.
There are two dangers of such a
revival. On the one hand, it increases the level of suspiciousness on both
sides and thus makes much of the normal work of diplomats far more difficult.
Indeed, it creates what can become a vicious circle of reinforcing assumptions
that will go a long way to make things worse.
And on the other, as Putin
understands but as many in the West do not, the fact that the West does not
want to believe that Moscow is doing what it obviously is doing because the
Kremlin claims otherwise gives Moscow a dangerous opening that can be ignored
only at the peril of those who do.
As long as Putin or anyone else who
thinks like him is in power in Moscow, the West has to avoid falling into
either trap that the Russian authorities are all too willing to set. Not
everyone the West might see as an agent is in fact one, but not everyone Moscow
claims isn’t one is in fact something else.
That was never easy during the Cold
War, and if anything it is more difficult now, not only because we have lost the
discipline imposed by a common opposition to communism but also because we have
sacrificed much of the kind of expertise any government needs to make these
critical distinctions.
Putin’s commitment to “hybrid”
activities – which is after all simply another term for saying one thing and
doing another – means that those subject to his attacks must develop the kind
of information gathering and analytic capacity needed to make those
distinctions, lest his bad behavior spread as memes do to areas where it will
do even more harm.
No comments:
Post a Comment