Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 6 – Not only are the
countries Russians identify as friendly more likely to be authoritarian and
poor than those they list as enemies, Andrey Illarionov says; but the former
are falling ever further behind the latter both in terms of GDP per capita and
the amount of freedom their citizens enjoy.
In a blog post today, the Moscow
economist says that polls routinely show that Russians consider the US,
Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Estonia, Great Britain, France and Ukraine
as its enemies and that they view Belarus, China, Kazakhstan, Syria, Armenia,
Cuba, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan and India as friends (echo.msk.ru/blog/aillar/1994996-echo/).
What
is striking, he suggests, is that almost all of the former are free and highly
developed countries while almost all of the latter are “unfree authoritarian
and economically less developed” ones. And what is worrisome is that over the
last 12 years, the two groups have diverged both economically and politically rather
than converged.
Over
that period, Illarionov says, “average GDP per capita among Russia’s “enemies”
rose 67.1 percent, while among its ‘friends,’ this measure stagnated –
increasingly only 1.3 percent.” As far as civil and political freedom is
concerned, the “enemies” remained high while the “friends” saw a decline of
almost 30 percent, using the Freedom House measures.
And
those trends mean that “the relative level of GDP per capita among Russia’s ‘friends’
compared to this measure among its ‘enemies’ fell from approximately 81 percent
in 2005 to 49 percent in 2016.” At the
same time, the relative level of political and civic freedoms of ‘the friends’
compared to that of ‘the enemies’ fell from 61 percent to 46 percent.
This
pattern leads to some devastating and disturbing conclusions: “Russia’s ‘enemies’
(that is, of the current Russian leadership are, as a rule, politically free
countries with well-off citizens who have long life expectancies, low crime,
and low levels of domestic and foreign aggression.”
“Russia’s
‘friends,’” in contrast, Illarionov says, “are as a rule unfree authoritarian
regime with poor residents who are condemned to short life expectancies, high
crime and high levels of domestic and foreign aggression.” Still worse this divergence is “rapidly growing”
rather than narrowing as many had hoped as recently as the 1990s.
No comments:
Post a Comment