Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 20 – One of the most disturbing
and yet instructive scenes in the Norwegian TV series “Occupied” about an
EU-assisted Russian occupation of Norway to ensure the supply of oil to the
rest of the European Union is when the EU promises to send forces to resist a new
Russian advance.
Airplanes from various European
countries do arrive, but the Norwegian defense force quickly discovers that the
planes lack bombs or bullets or indeed anything they would need to constitute a
military force. The EU representative says no one wants to get into a war with the
Russians – and blames the Norwegians for creating the problem in the first
place.
An analysis of an actual situation
in Ukraine mirrors that television series all too clearly. Mikhail Zhirokhov, a
Kyiv military analyst, says the US has been talking about sending two American
patrol boats to Ukraine for two years.
But only recently has there been any movement (dsnews.ua/politics/moskitnyy-otvet-kogda-ukraina-soberet-volchyu-stayu-v-azovskom-20072018080000).
In April of this year, Ukraine
formed up two crews of sailors for training in the US; and in June, the basic
talks about setting the conditions of the contract were completed. Ukrainian naval commanders say that they expect
to get both cutters “before the end of 2019.”
But even if they do arrive then, they may not make much of a difference.
Why? Zhirokhov asks rhetorically. Because,
he responds, under current arrangements, the US-produced ships “will be
delivered to Ukraine without any weapons.” They will thus not have any military
meaning at all.
His lament comes at the end of his
analysis of the current state of the Ukrainian fleet, one that will only leave Ukrainians
and their supporters in despair. After losing much of its fleet in 2014 when
Vladimir Putin occupied Crimea in the Anschluss, Ukraine has not had the money
or time to recover.
Even before that tragedy, Zhirokhov
says, Ukrainian defense planners were looking out to 2026 to modernize the fleet
because cash was short and Kyiv recognized that it would not be able to build
anything quickly without foreign support, something that so far has not been forthcoming.
There have been certain “pluses”
from this difficult situation, he continues. Ukrainian planners have focused on
developing longer-range ship-based missile systems and elaborated a naval
doctrine that resembles that of Israel. But those gains have been overshadowed
by more serious losses.
At the beginning of this month, the
Smart Maritime Group, which was a major contractor for Ukrainian naval ship
building, went bankrupt. There is no sign that it will recover, and there are
no good alternatives apparent.
That has driven Ukrainian defense
planners to focus on the more realistic scenario of “’a mosquito fleet,’” one
consisting of a larger number of smaller vessels, each specialized (artillery,
landing craft, and rocket-armed).” If current plans are realized, the Ukrainian
navy will have about 30 such vessels by 2020.
At that point but not before, the Ukrainian navy and
coastal forces will be able to create “serious problems for the Russians, if the
latter decide on a major war.” Israel, Zhirokhov says, shows what smaller ships
armed with longer-reaching weapons can do. But of course, such a “mosquito”
fleet are never going to be able to cope with an attack by a much larger
opponent.
So
far, Ukrainian yards have been able to provide six small armored artillery
cutters, with 18 more at various stages of construction and planning. In addition, the shipbuilders are working on “a
minimum” of two heavily armored landing craft.
And according to unconfirmed reports, they are also building two
rocket-launch-capable cutters as well.
But
while these are being built and while Ukrainians are “waiting for the
Americans,” the Ukrainian fleet has been expanding almost exclusively by the
arrival of support vessels. The
Ukrainian navy will be ready to defend the country by the next decade; but no
one should assume, Zhirokhov says, that it will be able to do so now against a
concerted attack.
No comments:
Post a Comment