Paul Goble
Staunton,
December 10 – Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov’s effort to expand his republic at
the expense of Ingushetia and Daghestan is radicalizing opinion against him,
the Chechens and Moscow in both places, with the near certainty there will be
more demonstrations by Ingush against the border accord and protests by
Daghestanis against his aspirations there.
St.
Petersburg’s Gorod-812 news portal interviewed a number of Ingush activists and
ordinary residents. “All without exception” were against the decision of the Russian
Constitutional Court and did little to “hide
their disappointment and anger, the portal says (gorod-812.ru/radikaliziruyut-li-ingushi-svoy-protest/).
Almost all of them
blamed the Kremlin for the decision, and many said the Ingush should ignore the
court’s decision. After all, in the words of one “our Constitutional Court”
ruled against the border accord and that should be enough for Ingush. If the Chechens and Moscow try to take the
land away from Ingushetia, they said, Ingush should protest and even go on
strike.
Street protests haven’t achieved
their goals, the activists said; and so it was time to consider other measures,
including a general strike. The issue of
the Prigorodny District is also resurfacing, with Ingush leaders saying that the
ruling of the court affects that as well. After all, there is no established border
between Ingushetia and North Ossetia.
Consequently, the portal says, “the
Ingush protest will continue” and likely intensify given that “by ignoring the
civil will of an entire people, the federal center is provoking a de facto a radicalization
of that people’s political demands, a development that in turn can be fraught
with the most dramatic consequences.”
Some of those will be in Ingushetia
itself, the portal suggests, but the greater ones will be beyond that republic’s
borders as other non-Russian republics draw conclusions about what Moscow’s
intensions are.
Meanwhile, Kadyrov’s talk about recreating
a Chechen district in Daghestan or even changing the borders between his
republic and that one is offending ever more Daghestanis who say they might
accept small border adjustments but that wholesale changes would lead to large
demonstrations (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/328964/).
Gadzhimurad
Sagitov, editor of Makhachakala’s Novoye Delo, notes that “over the course of
more than 20 years in the North Caucasus, the definition of borders of the subjects
has taken place without serious conflict …. But now in these questions there
can be observed ‘a negative tendency’ and it is possible that there has been ‘a
definite growth of tension.’”
He says that the borders between
Daghestan and Chechnya are reasonable and should not be changed. If they are, a
large number of non-Chechens would suddenly fight themselves in the status of ethnic
minorities in Chechnya, something they won’t be happy about and will certainly
protest.
How large these protests might be is
a matter of dispute. Some analysts say that they could be massive. But Makhachkala
resident Ruslan Magomedov says that they wouldn’t be like those in Ingushetia
because the peoples of Daghestan have an entirely different relationship with the
head of their republic.
Another Makhachkala resident, Murad
Magomedov, said, however, that because Daghestan is already defined as a
multi-national republic, there can be no justification for shifting the borders
unless somehow it could be shown that Chechnya once controlled land now inside
Daghestan. That is not the case, and so Daghestanis will certainly protest.
No comments:
Post a Comment