Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 15 – Many have
speculated that controls that were introduced to fight the pandemic may be
retained by the authorities to give them greater power over the population, and
there is one such tactic that Vladimir Putin may use if he feels compelled to
in response to the ongoing Khabarovsk protests.
That is a targeted lockdown of the population
in that Far Eastern region that Moscow can explain as being required not to suppress
dissent but to prevent a new outbreak of the coronavirus, Boris Kagarlitsky
says. That would work to Putin’s advantage because people in Moscow and the
West wouldn’t criticize him for that (krizis-kopilka.ru/archives/78205).
Indeed, many would likely view a
willingness to reimpose controls against what the center could report as a
spike in infections as a positive rather than negative step by the Kremlin,
even though in this case the target would not be a virus but rather popular anger
against the Moscow regime.
The Russian sociologist and
left-of-center commentator may be on to something. Khabarovsk mayor Sergey
Kravchuk has already suggested that the mass demonstrations against Moscow’s
removal of region head Sergey Furgal are a super spreader event as far as the
virus is concerned (versia.ru/myer-xabarovska-zayavil-ob-opasnosti-zarazheniya-koronavirusom-iz-za-mitingov-v-podderzhku-furgala).
And even if Putin does not use this
tactic in Khabarovsk, other Russian officials may be tempted to do so. Indeed,
Chechnya’s Ramzan Kadyrov has taken steps in the course of the pandemic that
appear to be more about defending his position than protecting the people (tass.ru/obschestvo/8964653).
No comments:
Post a Comment