Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 4 – In response
to a dramatic increase in the number of
counter-terrorist operations last month – five compared to four during all of
2019 – and more deaths – eight compared to five last year – Ingush leaders are
demanding an end to the siloviki practice of killing suspects rather than
arresting and trying them.
The practice of the siloviki, “as a
rule sent from other regions, is raising questions among residents of the
republic, public opinion leaders and human rights activists,” the editors of
the independent Fortanga news agency say (fortanga.org/2020/09/ubit-nelzya-zaderzhivat-pochemu-siloviki-v-ingushetii-vo-vremya-speczoperaczij-tak-chasto-ubivayut-lyudej/).
Dzhambulat Dzaurov, a member of the Council
of Teips of Ingushetia, says that the time has come to restore legality. It may
be that those the siloviki call terrorists are such, but that must be shown in
court rather than invoked as justification for what is little more than
murder. “Everyone is innocent until
convicted by a court.”
Ruslan Mutsolgov, head of the Ingushetia
branch of Yabloko, says that people in Ingushetia are especially outraged by
this practice because in their view, there hasn’t been an active underground
movement for a long time and because the siloviki are notorious for engaging in
torture and lies.
And those who know anything about
fighting terrorists or criminals in general know that it is far better to
arrest and interrogate people so as to learn more about their activities and
associates rather than simply killing them, he continues. Moscow typically pursues
arrests everywhere except in the North Caucasus.
In that region, not only do the
siloviki kill people without trial but they routinely engage in torture. Over
the last 18 years, Mutsolgov says, there have been “thousands of complaints”
about that, but “only four criminal cases” have been opened, and the
punishments handed out were “more formal” than real.
And Ingush lawyer Magomet Aushev
says that he believes the siloviki kill suspects in order to avoid the hard
work of gathering evidence against them. That is not only counterproductive
from the point of view of the authorities: it is a violation of the rights of
the victims and undermines the authority of officials.
No comments:
Post a Comment