Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 4 – Yesterday, the
leadership of Moscow’s Darul-Arkam mosque announced that they were indefinitely
suspending that religious center’s operation, exactly one week after Russian
police raised the mosque and arrested140 of those at prayer on suspicion of
extremism.
According to the mosque’s leaders,
they took this step on their own without any pressure from either Russian
officials or the owner of the land on which the facility sits and would
eventually resume operation after reorganizing (ansar.ru/person/2013/05/03/40379, wordyou.ru/v-rossii/zakryli-moskovskuyu-mechet-darul-arkam.html, ansar.ru/person/2013/04/29/40276
and tatar-centr.blogspot.com/2013/05/blog-post_2754.html).
The decision is disturbing for two
reasons: On the one hand, it follows a pattern of attacks on Muslim facilities
in Russian mosques that is increasingly familiar. And on the other, it means
that the more than two million Muslims in Moscow are now left with only four officially
registered mosques and are likely to turn to underground and likely more
radical ones.
As the leaders of the mosque pointed
out, about a month ago, “a campaign was begun to discredit both the mosque and
its leaders” by critics of Islam like Roman Silantyev. Then a week ago, the
police swept in and arrested 140 people, releasing all but a handful the same
day. And after that, the media filled up with attacks on the mosque as a hotbed
of “Islamist radicalism.”
The fact that almost all of the 140
detained were released the same day is clear evidence that the mosque is not
the source of the kind of problems the media have suggested, its leaders
say. And they suggest that closing the
mosque rather than reducing extremism is likely to produce more of it.
Many believers will be forced to
seek other mosques, including underground ones where the messages are likely to
be more radical, and they will view this latest action as the result of
official pressure and thus evidence of the growing hostility of the Russian
authorities to the Muslim believers in their midst.
Abdulla Rinat Mukhametov, a
political scientist at the Moscow Foundation for the Support of Humanitarian
Initiatives, said that the suspension of the mosque’s operation may have been a
logical step for its leaders but added that it certainly reflects the efforts
of those whowant to drive Islam out of Russia’s public space.
Because such people lack a legal
basis for moving against mosques, he continued, they use media campaigns and
other forms of pressure to achieve their goals of discrediting Muslim
organizations and Islam in general in the eyes of the Russian population. But
such efforts will have unintended consequences.
“When young people come to a legal
and transparent center, headed by constructively inclined and enlightened
people, the threat of radicalism declines by an order of magnitude,” Mukhametov
observed. “But when they are driven out of a legal mosque and it is in fact
closed, then they become an easy catch for those who will present this event as
“the struggle of Russia with Islam.’”
“It is wrong,” he suggested, “to
give into the hands of the extremists such cards as the closure” of mosques
like the Akam in the Russian capital.
No comments:
Post a Comment