Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 9 – Many Russians
are upset that their country lost 4.7 square kilometers last week as a result
of Moscow’s handing over of a border parcel to China, but so far at least, they
have expressed less anger that their country is losing 100 times as much
territory every year to global warming -- and that there is no prospect that
this can be stopped.
Dmitry Drozdov, the head of the Institute
on the Cryosphere of the Earth of the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy
of Sciences, says that the melting of the permafrost in the north is reducing the
size of Russia each year by an amount roughly equal to that of Andorra (tass.ru/sibir-news/2417561).
As a result of global warming, he
says, Russia is losing territory in the south as well as in the north, but in
the north, this process is having a far greater impact because warming
temperatures are melting the ice which forms as much as 80 percent of the volume
of coastal land. When it melts, the land simply disappears under the waves.
Consequently, Drozdov continues, it
is “senseless” to try to build up the northern coastline in the ways that the
authorities have done in the south. And it absolutely necessary to recognize
that at least for the foreseeable future, this continuing loss of Russian territory
will continue, as the zone of melt is moving northward at the rate of 30
kilometers a year.
The melting of the permafrost will
have a cascading effect on both flora and fauna in the region, killing off some
species while allowing ones that have never flourished there to grow. Meanwhile, he said, warming temperatures will
mean that currently highly productive agricultural lands in Stavropol and
Krasnodar are likely to experience water shortages.
At the same time, the center of
Russian agriculture will move northward 200 to 300 kilometers, to Voronezh or
even Moscow.
Another result of the melting of the
permafrost will be the contamination of water with a significant increase in
its bacterial content. Purifying that water will be “quite complicated,” the
scholar said. But “the most serious consequence” will be the destruction of the
coastline and of the surrounding ecology.
Over the last three years, the
Russian government has carried out a broad attack on ecological activists, most
infamously in the North Caucasus where it has incarcerated Yevgeny Vitishko for
his exposure of crimes by officials in the run-up to the Sochi Olympiad. But the authorities have moved against
environmentalists in the North.
Drozdov’s comments may have the
effect of re-empowering the ecological movement there, something that is
certain to spark controversy with Russian oil and gas companies that have run
roughshod over laws on the environment and whose own actions have in many cases
exacerbated the problems caused by global warming.
No comments:
Post a Comment