Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 28 – The compact
between Vladimir Putin and the Russian population consisted of two parts, one
in which the population as a whole gave up their claims to participate in
politics in exchange for stability and higher incomes and a second in which the
Kremlin leader bought off the emerging middle class by recognizing for them a
certain “territory of freedom.”
The first of these has been weakened
as a result of the economic crisis brought on by the collapse in the price of
oil and the imposition of sanctions and counter-sanctions, but for many parts
of the population, it has frayed but not come apart, as a result of the Kremlin’s
efforts to ensure that certain basic payments are made on which the population depends.
But the second compact, Vladislav
Inozemtsev argues, is in danger of rupture because “the powers that be are
confidently carrying out an attack on the middle class, on that stratum of ten
to fifteen million people who have been able to achieve something in the new
Russia and who were and remain the most active part of society” (intersectionproject.eu/ru/article/politics/nevynosimaya-tyazhest-bytiya).
While
the Russian government continues “to do a great deal” for government employees
and pensioners and thus largely retains their support, the Moscow economist
says, it is undermining its support among this group because it is cutting into
what the members of that group have expected as their rightful “territory of
freedom.”
The
Kremlin may assume that the support of the mass population is sufficient,
Inozemtsev says, but “experience shows that the elderly and the employees of
budget institutions in practice never save the powers that be from the next
revolution or Maidan” which in almost all cases are led by “the most well-off
and responsible citizens.”
The
Moscow commentator points to three of the areas where these attacks on the
Russian middle class are taking place: against debtors, with the imposition of
new fines on middle class activity, and regarding foreign ownership and foreign
bank accounts.
More
than 38 million Russians have bank loans, amounting to a total of 10.5 trillion
rubles (160 billion US dollars). Of this some 891 billion (15 billion US
dollars) are in arrears. Those who are behind in their payments are
increasingly subject to restrictions on their travel abroad under a 2007 law.
These
people are part of the growing army of those not allowed to travel abroad. They
number almost two million now, a number projected to rise to 4.5 million by
next year, is huge. In Moscow almost, “all most four percent of the adult
population” now falls into this category, Inozemtsev says.
But
thanks to more recent laws, those who are in debt and behind in their payments
may also be prevented from having the right to drive a car. “Just imagine,” Inozemtsev says, this
happening in the US and “reflect upon the political future of a congressman or
senator who would risk introducing such a bill in Congress.”
The
Russian middle class is also under attack by the government in the form of
fines imposed on drivers either for parking without paying or violating other
traffic laws, violations that are now being caught on video cameras. Such fines can rarely be appealed and
consequently they add to anger among the middle class toward the government.
Indeed,
Inozemtsev says, there is now a clear sense that “the authorities are
terrorizing the most independent and relatively well-off part of the
population, the very ‘middle class’ which for long years was the main
beneficiary of economic growth in the country and the support of the Putin
regime.”
And
third, the middle class is the most effected by new restrictions on foreign
bank accounts. Given that Russians own “more than 700,000” pieces of property
in Europe alone and that there are as many as 100,000 Russian students in
European countries, there are many Russians who need foreign accounts. Now they
are at risk of fines and other punishments.
Such
actions will affect “at a minimum” two million Russians, many of whom will
compare the way they are being treated
with those closer to the Kremlin. And
such comparisons, Inozemtsev implies, will hardly be likely to make them more
supportive of Putin and his regime.
No comments:
Post a Comment