Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 18 – Vladimir Putin “defends
Ivan the Terrible and Stalin ‘from excessive demonization’ because
unconsciously he feels himself” to share with them a common approach, Igor
Eidman says, and views criticism of them like criticism of himself as “the
slander of hatred foreigners.”
Stalin defended Ivan for the same
reason, the Russian commentator says; but unlike Putin, Stalin viewed the tsar
as “an insufficiently decisive murderer,” who should have killed more people.
Putin for part isn’t disturbed by the actions of Stalin and their continuing
impact on Russia (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=596CCC1269450).
“Ivan the Terrible was rehabilitated
under Stalin, but under Putin a creeping rehabilitation of not only Ivan but of
Stalin himself is going on,” Eidman continues, a reflection of the fact that
other paranoids don’t appear to have a problem to those who are paranoid
themselves. He then quotes Stalin on Ivan and Putin on both Ivan and Stalin to
make his point.
Stalin said that “the wisdom of Ivan
the Terrible consisted in the fact that he stood on a national point of view
and did not allow foreigners into his country, thus defending it from the
penetration of foreign influence. [He]
was very harsh [but] it was necessary to show” that in his times.
“One of the mistakes of Ivan the
Terrible consisted in that he did not cut down the five major feudal families.
If he had destroyed these five boyar families, then there wouldn’t have been a
time of troubles. But Ivan the Terrible
executed some and then for a long time repented and brayed … He needed to be
more decisive.”
Putin said of Ivan the Terrible that
it is “unknown whether he killed his son or not” and that the legend that he
did was the work of the papal nuncio “who came to him for negotiations and
tried to transform Orthodox Rus into Catholic Rus.” The nuncio then portrayed
Ivan as something extraordinary, but exactly the same thing was occurring
elsewhere at that time.
And finally, Putin said of Stalin: “Stalin
was a product of his times … It seems to me that excessive demonization of
Stalin is one of the means, one of the lines of attack on the Soviet Union and
Russia. in order to show that today’s Russia bears some birthmarks of Stalin.
So what? – We all bear some birthmarks of some kind or another.”
No comments:
Post a Comment