Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 13 – Anyone who
watches Moscow television would assume the country was in the midst of an
election campaign – there are learned discussions of who will win and why, what
participation is likely to be, and what role if any outside players have in
determining the outcome, Kseniya Kirillova says.
And he or she would be right, the
Russian media is in the midst of an election campaign but it is a campaign
taking place not in Russia where competitive elections for president haven’t
occurred in decades but in Ukraine where they have become an entirely normal
phenomenon, the US-based Russian journalist says (day.kyiv.ua/ru/blog/politika/ukrainskie-vybory-v-rossii).
To
be sure, Kirillova continues, the Russian commentators put their own spin on
events in Ukraine about which as things stand now they must say only bad things
of nothing at all; but it is clear that they are taking a certain vicarious pleasure
in the kind of competition a real election offers and that they haven’t seen in
their own country in some time.
What
is not known is whether Russians are receiving the message the Kremlin wants delivered
or whether they are seeing in all this reporting a system that they can easily
recognize is likely to be far more responsive to the demands of ordinary people
than is the case in their own country.
In
a word, the journalist says, “Ukraine yet again has give Moscow the chance to
play at the imitation of the political process” it doesn’t allow at home, a
dangerous game to be sure because some of its audience may decide that a competitive
democracy is exactly what they themselves would like to have.
As
a result, Kirillova continues, “one cannot but agree with the precise ironic
commentary of Ivan Davydov about ‘the Ukrainian occupation of Russia.’ By means
of the Kremlin’s efforts, Ukraine already for six years has successfully
controlled the Russian information space and defined the worldview of Russians
and their agenda.”
According
to the Russian journalist, “the Kremlin will do everything possible to extend
this occupation for as long as possible,” clearly not aware that it is engaged
in something that could backfire on it in ways exactly the opposite of what it
clearly hopes for and even expects.
No comments:
Post a Comment