Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 4 – Many
non-Russians in the Middle Volga and the North Caucasus have been infuriated by
the efforts of Russian nationalists to erect statues on their territory to
Russian imperialists who conquered their lands and brutalized their peoples
with most viewing it as the latest manifestation of the recrudescence of
Russian imperialism.
But until now, few had suggested
that it was anything more than self-affirmation by ethnic Russians rather than
something more ominous – a plan to provoke non-Russians into the kind of violent
reaction that would allow or force Moscow to intervene and suppress the non-Russians
as some Russians would like.
Now a group of Chuvash activists has
done just that, circulating a petition declaring the erection of statues to
Russian rulers is intended to provoke such an outcome, demanding the statues be
removed, and warning non-Russians not to be drawn (ru.chuvash.org/news/5006.html
and change.org/p/инициаторы-установки-памтника-ивана-грозному-требование-чувашской-национально-интеллигенции-о-сносе-провакационных-символов).
The
authors from the Christian Turkic republic in the Middle Volga make this
argument in advance of the planned commemoration of the centenary of the creation
of modern Chuvash statehood on June 24, 2020. They say that Chuvash would like
to mark that event in a worthy way but two Russian actions are making that far
more difficult.
On the one hand, the proposed
constitutional amendments are intended to undermine the federative foundations
of the state and reduce the rights of its subjects. And on the other, there has
been a movement to erect in Cheboksary statues of Russian imperial leaders that
is infuriating the Chuvash.
Figures like Ivan the Terrible, Orthodox
“saints” Petr and Fevroniya, and Elizabeth II don’t have “any relationship to
the Chuvash people or the Chuvash Republic and are “an open form” of “everything
anti-Chuvash, anti-state and anti-civilizational” attitudes and actions in the
Russian Federation today.
Putting up such statues is an obvious
“provocation,” because it cannot fail to anger the Chuvash people, the petition
says. And those who are behind such
monuments must have known that these statues would have that effect and thus
are intentionally or not “setting various forces of society against one another
by generating inter-ethnic and inter-religious discord.”
“We consider,” the petition
continues, “that these destructive forces have miscalculated, and that the people
of Chuvashia will not allow in the republic [such] conflicts.” But because
there is a risk, the authors say, they want the statues taken down and those
behind them to end their dangerous games.
The petition ends with an appeal to “the
Chuvash nation and all the people of the Chuvash Republic” to avoid “unthought
out and illegal steps” against these destructive actions lest such moves come
back to haunt them.
Not only does this petition make it
clear that Chuvash concerned about stability see the statues to Russian conquerors
as something more than just monuments, but it shows that ethnic and religious
relations in what has usually been viewed as a peaceful are anything but just
below the surface and could explode if the authorities continue to pursue this
dangerous policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment