Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 9 – Vladimir Putin
has met two of the West’s demands concerning Ukraine -- recognition of the
presidential elections there and a pullback of Russian forces from the border –
but he will stop backing the secessionists only if they win, the Ukrainian army defeats them, or he
recognizes that he is creating his own nemesis by re-energizing NATO.
The last may unexpectedly prove the
most important, Andrey Illarionov writes in a blog post today. That is because “by his military campaign in
Ukraine, Vladimir Putin has achieved what was practically impossible and
unthinkable only a few months ago” – the revival of NATO as a defense alliance
and its projection of force and guarantees eastward toward Russia (echo.msk.ru/blog/aillar/1336800-echo/).
To date, the Russian analyst says,
Putin has changed only his tactics not his strategy, but what he is doing
leaves “practically” no room for a diplomatic resolution of the situation in
eastern Ukraine and leaves him with fewer options to respond to any future
imposition of sanctions, thus leaving him without the ability to distract
Russian attention.
And the Kremlin leader has changed
his tactics not because of sanctions imposed so far or threatened but because
after what Illarionov calls “the historic conversation” of US Secretary of
Defense Chuck Hagel and Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu, Moscow has been
confronted by a broad, US-led “program of resisting Putin’s aggression in
Europe.”
Illarionov lists 15 aspects of US
President Barack Obama’s program that the Russian analyst says are having an
impact on the Kremlin.
First, for the first time over the
last two decades, a US president has publically declared that an attack on Poland,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Romania, all NATO member countries, will prompt
a NATO response under Article Five and that the West is prepared to defend them
against a Russian attack.
Second, the US president has “publically
called Putin’s actions “Russia’s aggression against Ukraine” and a violation of
the basis for cooperation between NATO and Moscow.
Third, Obama has “confirmed” that
NATO will go ahead with the installation of ABM sites in Eastern Europe,
something that it had delayed for several years at Moscow’s insistence, and
will complete that action before 2018.
Fourth, Illarionov points out, “the
US has begun a new program” of basing arms supplies in Eastern Europe and
expanding military training and joint exercises there.
Fifth, “NATO has already increased
its military presence throughout all of Eastern Europe ‘from the Baltic to the
Black Sea,’” with additional flights over the Baltic countries, NATO ships in the
Black Sea, and larger and more frequent military exercises across the region.
Sixth, the US “for the first time”
is permanently basing American forces, in this case, so far, aviation units, in
Poland.
Seventh, the US is beginning a new
partnership program” with the friends of the US: Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia.
Eighth, President Obama has asked
Congress for an additional appropriation of one billion dollars to support
these programs.
Ninth, “the US and NATO have begun a
campaign to increase the military budgets of ember countries up to a minimum of
two percent of GDP.”
Tenth, the US has
launched a program to increase energy exports to Europe and thus reduce the
dependence of the latter on Russian supplies.
Eleventh, the US is
promoting “other means” for the diversification of energy supplies to Europe.
Twelfth, the West has
blocked the construction of the South Flow pipeline Putin has promoted.
Thirteenth, the US is
providing military support to Kyiv.
Fourteenth, the US and
other Western countries have declared that they will never “recognize the
Russian occupation of Crimea.”
And fifteenth, US President
Obama has declared that “any country
which is a neighbor of Russia and is subject to aggression by Putin ‘be it
Ukraine, a NATO member country, Moldova or another’ will receive support from
the United States.
Every one of these
moves, far more than sanctions, is having an impact on the Kremlin, Illarionov
says, adding that “what is particularly important to note is that the majority”
of these measures will now “be carried out independently of Putin’s actions” in
Ukraine and thus won’t be affected by a possible change in the Kremlin’s
policy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment