Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 23 – Vladimir Putin
has repeated the two chief mistakes of Yury Andropov – invading a neighboring country
and shooting down a civilian aircraft – but he doesn’t have the Soviet-era KGB
and CPSU chief’s options anytime soon of a return to totalitarianism or a shift
to officers in the organs who can get Russia out of its difficulties.
That is the judgment of Sergey Grigoryants,
a prominent dissident in Soviet times who suffered for his actions and who
today is a thorough-going critic of the Putin regime and its crimes. His words
merit the closest attention because Grigoryants very much knows whereof he
speaks (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=53CE9B6D3D65F).
Having in the space of three months
repeated Andropov’s mistakes, Putin doesn’t have the options that the former
Soviet leader did. He has not developed the institutions he would need to
impose totalitarian control over the country – institutions Andropov had and
developed over 15 years – and he doesn’t have young and supposedly pure KGB and
party operatives who can try to save the situation.
In short, there are neither camps nor
Gorbachevs immediately available to Putin, all speculation about both notwithstanding,
Grigoryants says. No one should be under any “illusion” about that.
Grigoryants says that in his view, “the KGB
and the MVD are not capable of creating real terror in the country. Censorship,
the destruction of the electoral system and public life, and suppression of the
Internet are insufficient for that.” And
the options of turning to the West by reforming at home are very, very limited.
No one believes Putin anymore after what
he has done, the commentator continues, and consequently, it is “already too
late” for the Kremlin leader to present himself as something other than an
outlaw, especially since “in terms of his moral qualities, Putin is no better
than Andropov or Stalin.”
And Putin isn’t about to yield power to
anyone else, Grigoryants continues. He won’t commit suicide as legend has it
that Nicholas I did out of a sense of shame. And his system does not allow for the
emergence of a serious alternative. That
makes it “very difficult to imagine” what will happen next, he says. But almost
certainly, it will not be anything good.
No comments:
Post a Comment