Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 20 – Many have
focused on the reasons behind Vladimir Putin’s replacement of 11 governors in
recent weeks and on the challenges the new men face in meeting his expectations
in dealing with economic problems immediately and preparing their regions for
the upcoming presidential elections.
But now the Guild of Inter-Ethnic
Journalists has compiled a list of the nationality problems many of them will
face in their new positions, problems that could have serious consequences for
their ability to meet Putin’s demands and that in some cases could lead to
serious instability (nazaccent.ru/content/25717-gubernatorskoe-nasledstvo.html).
Four of the 11,
the ethnic journalists say, face serious and immediate problems. Three others
are confronted by problems that could become serious. And four more,
overwhelmingly ethnic Russian oblasts, might appear to be insured against such
outcomes; but to ignore ethnic issues there would also be a mistake.
The change in Daghestan, the most
Islamic and multi-ethnic republic within the borders of the Russian Federation
has attracted the most attention. On the one hand, for the first time in 50
years, an outsider rather than an Avar or Dargin has been put in charge. And on
the other, the new man, Ramazan Abdulatipov has said he will no longer support
nationality quotas in government positions.
That alone threatens to spark
problems even if ultimately it is the only way to overcome the strength of the
clans that have long dominated that North Caucasus republic. But there are two
other serious problems Vladimir Vasilyev, a Russian-Kazakh, will have to
address in the very near term.
Conflicts over land, all of which
are invested with ethnic meaning, are heating up again. And Makhachkala has
pointed out that “more than half of the languages of the peoples of Daghestan
are at the brink of extinction” (tass.ru/v-strane/4632812), an
acknowledgement that by itself will stir passions.
Primorsky kray presents its new
governor Andrey Tarasenko with a different but equally serious challenge: Historically
populated by Ukrainians and a large number of numerically small indigenous
peoples, it now faces the prospect of being inundated by ethnic Russians under
Putin’s “far eastern hectare” program, which gives a hectare free to those who
move there.
The program has no protections for
the indigenous peoples who fear they will be overrun and their traditional way
of life destroyed. Many of them have
organized to protest this Moscow notion, and they have picked up support from
other indigenous peoples elsewhere in the Russian Federation. What happens in Primorsky kray will thus
affect large swaths of the country.
In Samara oblast, an outsider has
been appointed, Dmitry Azarov, and he must cope with the fact that his
predecessor Nikolay Merkushkin, in office in Samara for five years, had brought
with him from Mordvinia where he ruled the previous 17 an entire team that will
have to be rooted out if the new man is to put his stamp on things.
That won’t be easy to do without
sparking conflicts ethnic and otherwise.
And in Krasnoyarsk kray, the new
man, Aleksandr Uss, will have to try to find a way to deflect efforts by the
residents of the former Taymyr (Dolgano-Nenets) Autonomous District to split
off from his fiefdom, efforts that have been going on since Putin forced the amalgamation
of the small non-Russian federal subject with a larger and predominantly
Russian kray.
In three other federal subjects,
there will also be some problems: Omsk Oblast has a significant ethnic Kazakh
diaspora and numerous ethnic Russians. The Nenets Autonomous District has the
problems of the numerically small peoples of the North to deal with. And Pskov
Oblast must deal not only with the Finno-Ugric Seto people but the problems of
ethnic Russians as well.
Gubernatorial changes have also
occurred in four other, predominantly ethnic Russian oblasts, Ivanovo, Oryol,
Nosobirsk, and Nizhny Novgorod. Many
might assume there are no ethnic problems there, but Igor Barinov, the head of the
Federal Agency for Nationality Affairs, suggested otherwise.
On the one hand, mono-ethnic regions
are often the most explosive when outsiders come in as migrants because they
have no experience in tolerance of minorities. And on the other, he argues, “mono-ethnic
regions” are often places where the strongest nationalistic ideas are first to
emerge.
No comments:
Post a Comment