Paul Goble
Staunton,
July 4 – The entire world seems to know that July 4th is US
Independence Day; but very few are aware that the same day (O.S.) is also the
anniversary of Siberia’s declaration of independence from Moscow. This year is
the centenary of that action, and it has become an occasion for reflection
about not just the past but the future as well.
In
1918, following an anti-colonial rising of the Siberian people against
Muscovite Bolshevism, regionalist Yaroslav Zolotaryev recalls, Petr Vologodsky
and a group of like-minded Siberians proclaimed the establishment of the
Siberian Democratic Republic, the highwater mark of Siberian independence (afterempire.info/2018/07/04/siberia-100/).
The
state existed behind the lines of a front; and was opposed by a Bolshevik force
that at least initially consisted of Hungarian and German POWs rather than
Russians let alone Siberians. In the
declaration, the Siberian republic specified that “no legitimate Russian
statehood existed in the summer of 1918.”
Having
dispersed the Constituent Assembly, the Bolsheviks had lost any claim to be
legitimate other than one based on superior force. The western regions of the
country were occupied by the Germans, and the Don and the Caucasus had de facto
separated themselves from the Muscovite state.
Unfortunately,
all claims to the contrary, “the situation of the illegality of the central
authorities [in Russia] has been maintained to this day,” Zolotaryev says. “In order to secure legal succession with pre-Bolshevik
Russia, it would have been necessary to convene a Constituent Assembly in 1991
and genuinely condemn the communists” for their actions.
“But
because this wasn’t done,” the regionalist writer continues, Russia today “does
not have any relation to the tsars or to their Russia. [Its rulers and people]
have a relationship only to those very same Bolsheviks who destroyed that
Russia.”
In
July 1918, the Siberians expressed their hopes that a democratic Russia would
emerge and that they would then, on the basis of close consultation with the
population, be able to establish close relations with it. But the fundamental reality of that time was
that “Russia in general did not exist while Siberia did,” in the view of those
behind the declaration.
Zolotaryev
says that the “symbolic” parallel between the two places which declared their
independence on this date. The Siberians did so on July 4th old
style; and the Americans on that date new style. Siberians have always looked to the US as a
model; and in the 19th century, they envisioned the creation of a
United States of Siberia.
“However,
they weren’t able to achieve this and therefore the current contrast between the
two is extremely instructive – a flourishing democratic American state and an
unhappy Asiatic colony oppressed by the totalitarian Putin regime, a land which
does not have even its own political status” but is just “a collection of
oblasts in the east of the empire.”
According
to Zolotaryev, Siberians could easily have “made out of Siberia if not America
then at least Canada.” The Siberian regionalists of a century ago were “people
of democratic or moderately socialist convictions: in the present-day European
political spectrum they would correspond to left liberals and social democrats.”
Had
they not been suppressed by the Red Army, the Siberians could have achieved
real miracles; but they lost and were forced into emigration, where they formed
“a Siberian diaspora” which produced books and memoirs about their
accomplishments. That is happening again
now (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2018/06/a-new-siberian-emigration-takes-shape.html).
Despite the Bolshevik victory over
the Siberians, “the dream of the Siberian people” never entirely disappeared
and flared up anew during Perestroika “when again arose a massive regionalist
and at the same time democratic movement.”
It too has been harassed and suppressed by the Muscovite regime to this
day.
Within Siberia and Russia, it is
thus almost impossible to speak publicly about Siberian independence; but the people
have not forgotten it or the possibilities it offers for “a glorious future,” one
that will build on the struggle of the Siberian regionalists of 1918.”
Their actions, Zolotaryev says, are “the
historical ray of light which guides us on the road ahead when after the
inevitable fall of the Kremlin imperial regime, the Siberian people must again
decide everything on their own just as they began to decide their fate” a century
ago on July 4, 1918.
No comments:
Post a Comment