Paul Goble
Staunton,
December 17 – The battle for autocephaly for the Ukrainian Orthodox is now
over, Aleksandr Soldatov says, whose outcome has “gigantic political and
cultural-symbolic meaning.” But the battle for the Russian Orthodox Church is
only beginning, and that fight has if anything even greater significance.
The
outcome of the Ukrainian battle, the Russian commentator says, “restructures
world Orthodoxy” and Christianity as a whole and “pushes aside the Moscow Patriarchate
with its “’Russian world’ pretensions into quite marginal positions” not only
internationally but at home (graniru.org/opinion/m.274312.html).
“Symbolically,
autocephaly raises the status of Ukraine as a state, making it not just ‘a
remnant of an empire’ seeking its independence but as a self-standing Christian
nation with its own thousand-year church tradition,” something Moscow-centered
states have sought repeatedly to deny and suppress.
With
Ukrainian autocephaly having been achieved, Soldatov says, “there is a 100
percent chance” that the Moscow Patriarchate will again enter into a new period
of “isolation because its break with canonical communion with the Constantinople
Patriarchate over Ukraine has not been supported by a single [Orthodox] church.”
“The independence of the Kyiv church
was annexed by Moscow together with left-bank Ukraine at the end of the 17th
century. On October 11 of this year, the Constantinople patriarch officially
denounced its agreement on the temporary administration of the Kyiv
metropolitan which it gave to Moscow in 1686,” Soldatov points out.
Constantinople “asserts that Moscow immediately
violated all the conditions of this act but that Constantinople for all these
330 years did not have the political possibility to restore justice. Now such a
possibility has appeared: for this was required the bloody war in the Donbass.
The majority of Ukrainians agree that it is impossible to reach agreement with
Putin.”
Ukraine has tried to achieve
autocephaly over the past century, but not one of its efforts until now
achieved that goal. Moscow was too strong. But the events of this week show the
world “that now neither the Moscow Patriarchate nor the Moscow Kremlin has the
weight” necessary to stop this restoration of historical justice.
This achievement would not have happened
without the efforts of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and his goals were
“above all” political, Soldatov argues; “and Moscow reacted to Ukrainian
autocephaly above all politically” rather than as a church issue. The main
question remains whether Putin is prepared to launch ‘’a war for the faith’” in
this century.
“Undoubtedly, the triumph of
Ukrainian autocephaly has already led to a significant decline in the rating of
Patriarch Kirill both in Russia itself and beyond its borders,” a decline that is
even more striking because of the rise of Putin favorite, Metropolitan Tikhon,
who appears to be a more flexible and clever church politician than Kirill.
But Tikhon and Putin are not now in
a position to restore Moscow to the position it once occupied. “On the map of world Orthodoxy, Ukraine is a
key territory: namely control of Ukraine guaranteed the Russian Orthodox Church
the status of the leader of Orthodox by number of parishes.” The ROC MP will
now lose most if not all of those.
“Despite all the ‘heroic’
rhetoric of the present leadership of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the
Moscow Patriarchate,” most priests and parishioners now within it view the
hierarchy as a state institution rather than a church. They might not have been
willing to break with it before Ukrainian autocephaly, but over time, most of
them will.
“The battle for Ukrainian autocephaly
is thus finished,” Soldatov says; but the most interesting aspect of this
development is beginning: the global restructuring of Orthodoxy promises to be enormous
and – sooner or later – will reach Russia as well.”
No comments:
Post a Comment