Paul Goble
Staunton, May 19 – The success Yekaterinburg
residents have had it getting the attention of Vladimir Putin and thus of the
local authorities via their massive street protests against plans to build a cathedral
in what has been a public park is convincing civic activists in ever more Russian
cities that similar demonstrations are the only way they can win out.
Groups opposed to church
construction in Chelyabinsk, Ulyanovsk, Tambov and Nizhny Novgorod are among
those who have drawn this conclusion, Darina Shevchenko of Radio Svoboda says, a
development that threatens to spark protests in many more places if the authorities
don’t listen to their demands or fail to keep their promises in Yekaterinburg.
Denis
Ibragimov, the Open Russia coordinator in Chelyabinsk, has already sent the mayor
there an appeal saying that there could be a Yekaterinburg-style wave of protests
in his city soon because what has happened in Yekaterinburg has “gone beyond
the borders of the city and become federal” (svoboda.org/a/29949668.html).
“I was in Yekaterinburg during the
conflict over the construction of the church in the square and spoke with many
city residents. I didn’t meet one who was for building the church. People either
are actively resisting or are quietly angry” about the idea, Ibragimov says,
adding that “in Chelyabinsk a similar situation is arising.”
The local bishopric is going ahead
with plans to build a church in public space, citing the results of public
hearings. But these hearings, the activist says, were fake and should be
ignored because city residents were not informed about them “in the required
way.” When people found out what the
city had done, they organized petitions and appeals.
“I consider that officials have laid
a mine under the situation,” Ibragimov says, “by ignoring the opinion of young
people. We already are different and not a Soviet generation. Church people tell
us to read the Old Testament, but what is the Old Testament to me if I live in the
21st century?”
As for Vladimir Putin, the activist
continues, he too is someone from the past rather than the future. In short,
Ibragimov says. “Putin himself is a pensioner” and thinks like pensioners do, referring
on one occasion to the Yekaterinburg protesters as “the godless,” something
only a Soviet-thinking person would.
Chelyabinsk residents are ready to
take to the streets and the officials know it, he continues. Indeed, “I am certain that a conflict is
inevitable if the authorities do not leave our square in peace.” That fact may explain why officials reacted
so quickly to his appeal: they asked him to come in and promised a response
within a few days.
Meanwhile, in Tambov, Diana
Rudakova, an architect who heads the Navalny staff in that city, said that the
local bishopric has been pushing for the construction of a church in a major
square. It has the right to ask for that but not to ignore the attitudes of
everyone else in the city or play games with officials to hold hearings about this
that people don’t know about.
“We found out about the hearings
late and acted quickly,” the activist says. We put out a video clip and posted
it on line and at least for a time have been able to stop the actions of the
Russian Orthodox Church whose behavior seems increasingly strange even though
it has the support of the nominally secular officials.
“No one understands the motivation
of the church,” Rudakova continues. “I think that that the general policy of the
ROC in Russia is to seize central social spaces as if the clericals are playing
a computer game” rather than engaged in religious activities. The fight against them will continue.
“If we aren’t listened to, then we
will organize meetings and pickets,” she says. “Tambov residents are in no way
worse than the residents of Yekagterinburg. I am certain that the residents of
our city will demonstrate their position. Now, already, the entire city is
talking about the ROC’s intentions.”
According to Rudakova, “bureaucrats --
and the metropolitanate includes the same bureaucrats -- have entirely lost
their links with reality. The authorities do not understand that people need
parks and squares: they do not need churches.”
“The events in Yekaterinburg and
those which possibly will occur in other cities of Russia are the result of the
general policy of the state, the lack of dialogue and understanding between society
and the powers that be. We have no instruments of interaction,” and officials
take decisions in secret and in isolation from the people.
And she concludes: “the residents of
Yekaterinburg tried first to defend the square in legal ways. They were not
given that chance. This means that street protests will be repeated throughout
Russia and are beginning to gather strength.”
No comments:
Post a Comment