Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 7 – In most countries,
few judges have police backgrounds; but in Russia, 58 percent of judges
overseeing criminal cases are former siloviki, an origin that helps to explain
why Russian courts now find a higher percentage of those charged guilty (99.87
percent) than did Soviet ones in Stalin’s time.
These are just some of the results
reported in a new study by the Jurisprudence State Corporation now being
discussed in the media (thinktanks.by/publication/2019/10/07/v-rossii-58-sudey-spetsializiruyuschihsya-na-ugolovnyh-delah-byvshie-siloviki.html
and proekt.media/research/nezavisimost-sudey).
The study said that, at present,
Russia has approximately 34,000 judges who work in about 10,000 courts. They are supported by staffs who directly support
them numbering 86,000 and indirectly by court staffs with more than 165,000 employees.
It also reported that during the last three years, only two percent of new
judges had backgrounds as lawyers.
Many Russians have told Levada
Center sociologists that they are dissatisfied with the courts, feeling that they
are not arbiters of justice but a tool the regime uses against them for its own
purposes. This sense that the courts are captives of the state continues to
grow, Novyye izvestiya reports (newizv.ru/article/tilda/04-10-2019/kak-rossiyskie-sudi-stali-zalozhnikami-sistemy-sudebnoy-i-politicheskoy).
Not only do lawyers only rarely
become judges, but the system is stacked in favor of the siloviki. The process
of selecting judges gives the last and perhaps definitive word to the FSB
rather than to other lawyers or the legal fraternity. Not surprisingly, its
officers have their own point of view about how any accused should be treated.
One recent study found, the paper continues,
that “the entire system works against people.” Those accused are assumed to be
guilty and the courts act accordingly. And the FSB’s blocking of complaints against
judges has reinforced this pattern (mk.ru/social/2018/09/27/fsb-ne-budet-prinimat-ot-grazhdan-zhaloby-na-sudey.html).
According to a survey carried out by scholars
at the European University in St. Petersburg, only 50 percent of judges think
their task is to protect the rights of the accused, and only 36.5 percent believe
they should care about justice. Instead, they only want to ensure the letter of
the law is carried out. If the laws are bad, so too will be the decisions.
When the Soviet Union fell apart, there was a brief period when it appeared possible that Russian courts would move in a more positive direction. But the continued presence of Supreme Court head Vyacheslav Lebedev, who has been in office 30 years, have made that impossible. The real turning point came in 1996 when judges began to be appointed for life.
When the Soviet Union fell apart, there was a brief period when it appeared possible that Russian courts would move in a more positive direction. But the continued presence of Supreme Court head Vyacheslav Lebedev, who has been in office 30 years, have made that impossible. The real turning point came in 1996 when judges began to be appointed for life.
Lebedev’s recent reappointment as head of the
Supreme Court, Novyye izvestiya says, “is a signal that the way the judicial
system now functions completely satisfies the current powers that be.” Unless
they are changed, Russia’s courts are unlikely to be anytime soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment