Staunton,
January 19 – In the face of a rising percentage of Muslims in the Russian armed
forces and of calls for a special handbook for them to be prepared by Muslim
leaders, a professor at the Russian military academy must ensure that the
training of soldiers will “be based only on a scientific worldview,” rather
than a religiously-inspired one.
Given “growing
inter-ethnic tensions” connected with the recent demonstrators, Sergey
Ivaneyev, who teaches at the All-Forces Academy of the Russian armed services,
says in “Voenno-Promyslenny kuriyer,”, “the link between religious and ethnic
self-identification” is intensifying throughout Russian society (vpk-news.ru/articles/8548).
While
much of this and especially the opposition between “the Slavic Russian
population and Muslims” is both “artificial and provocative,” he continues, no
one should ignore this problem or fail to work to prevent its growth,
especially in key institutions like the Russian armed forces.
“All of
us must recognize, Ivaneyev writes, “that in Russia, mass religiosity of
citizens is a potential source of conflict since each religious system as a
result of antagonist social conditions has by its nature a negative and at
times openly hostile attitude toward other religions.”
Such
relations, he continues, can take on “hypertrophic forms” and affect entire
communities, something that is “especially evident when leaders of a negative
direction” use the presence of their co-religionists or co-ethnics in military
units of various sizes to promote their own interests or to defend their groups
against commanders and others
Indeed, such
“inter-ethnic conflicts can acquire particularly sharp and fanatic forms” and
lead to calls for “a religious war” and for “the complete destruction of its
opponent and of members of all other faiths.” And that danger, Ivaneyev
continues, is visible in calls for the production of “a special handbook for
Muslim draftees” that some muftis want to prepare.
Seven years ago, the Russian
military, working with Sheikh Ravil Gaynutdin, prepared a 102-page booklet
entitled “Methodological Recommendations to Infantry Officers on Work with
Muslim Soldiers.” But despite the
shortcomings of that pamphlet, Ivaneyev says, allowing Russian muftis to
prepare and disseminate a larger one could exacerbate the situation.
Even the 2005 publication suffered because
it was written “not on the basis of scientific religious studies but from the
position of a contemporary ‘ideological’ theology and objectively was directed
at the strengthening of the position of Islam in society and in the Armed
Forces of the Russian Federation and also at the defense of this religion” from
analysis and criticism.
Any new work, prepared not by
scholars but by Muslim religious leaders, he says, would be even more
provocative, for as the Carnegie Moscow Center scholar A.V. Malashenko has put
it, “we observe a lack of correspondence between the Islamic and Russian civil
vectors of identity.”
Russia’s force structures, the
military scholar says, “have dealt well with the tasks of destroying and
neutralizing the expansion of Islamism.” But there is a shortcoming in their
work more generally: “we do not always know about those social-worldview
sources which feed contemporary forms of Islamic extremism, fundamentalism and
terrorism.”
And that means there is a real risk
that the spread of the Islamic faith, especially if it takes place on its own
terms, could lead to “anti-social activity” and forms of “Muslim extremism,”
which starts with efforts to hold Islam “as the highest model of spiritual
culture which [supposedly] corresponds to the interests of the individual and
world society as a whole.”
A directive of the Procurator
General, Interior Ministry and FSB on December 16, 2008, Ivaneyev says,
specified that “extremism under the cover of Islam has spread into a number of
phenomena which are essentially influencing the criminogenic situation in
Russia” and that “90 percent” of those involved in terrorism “have direct ties
to Islamist organizations.”
Today, given “the clericalization of
the army and fleet,” he continues, “the underlying principles of the very
conception of the training of soldiers of the Armed Forces of the Russian
Federation are being violated,” and consequently, commanders must work to
promote “a scientific world view” and its related “moral norms.”
In this situation, “the importance
of the problem of forming the moral-legal consciousness of Russia’s Muslim
soldiers is growing in particular.”
Those who are to be “convinced
defenders” of Russia, he argues, “must be trained only from the position of a
secular worldview” and be ready to act “not according to religious motivations”
before God and eternity “but from the conviction of the need to fulfill his
civic obligations regardless of his personal religious convictions.”
Such an approach, Ivaneyev says, is
necessary “because Russian society is multi-national and poly-confessional.”
Allowing Muslim religious leaders to instruct Muslim soldiers on their own could
undermine these various goals, and consequently, the military must insist that
Muslim troops learn not from them but from “the study of the foundations of
scientific Islamic studies.”
No comments:
Post a Comment