Paul Goble
Staunton,
January 30 – Russia has only “a half century left” as a people and a state if
it is unable to overcome its currently rapid demographic decline, according to Archpriest
Dimitri Smirnov, the former head of the Moscow Patriarchate’s department for
work with the military and law enforcement and the current head of its
commission on the family.
Smirnov,
who has often gotten in trouble for his outspoken manner, says that today Russians
“do not like and do not want children,” attitudes that “translated into Russian”
mean that “we do not want Russia to continue” and that “we want that our
culture will die and that in place of our churches there will be mosques” (interfax-religion.ru/?act=news&div=54277).
In
his comments to Interfax this week, the archpriest also lashed out at those who
use the term “’institution of the family.’” That is one of many “strange
communist stupidities,” he said, because if the family is an institution, “then
we can liquidate [it] and create another,” which he suggested is exactly what
is happening in the West.
And
he concludes with the observation that the mass media are undermining the
situation rather than helping. That needs to be stopped, he adds, implying that
censorship must be imposed and that those promoting dissoluteness need to be
removed. If that happens, he says, “something could happen” in a positive
direction, adding that “the state can help here.”
It
would be a mistake to dismiss such comments as the attitudes of just one
Orthodox churchman. On the one hand,
Smirnov has an enormous following among the security forces and likely reflects
the fears that many in those structures have.
And on the other, his apocalypticism is not of the passive kind but
rather one in service of radical change.
While
the archpriest may not want the restoration of Soviet-style controls – indeed,
on many other occasions, he has sharply condemned the Soviet past and Communist
attacks on religion and the Russia nation – he clearly favors a new kind of
rightist and traditionalist authoritarianism.
No comments:
Post a Comment