Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 27 – Many commentators
have pointed out that Moscow’s seizure of Crimea will give it much greater
freedom of action at its Sevastopol naval base and allow the Russian government
to project greater power southward against the littoral states, including
Turkey, and into the Mediterranean.
But two maps accompanying a blog
post by Moscow commentator Andrey Illarionov call attention to what may be an
equally serious consequence of Vladimir Putin’s latest moves, a consequence
that will be all the greater if Russian forces move deeper into Ukraine,
especially along the Black Sea littoral.
Those maps show the national
delimitation of the Black Sea and its sea bed before the Russian intervention
and after it, one that suggests that Moscow will now be in a position to claim
more than twice as much area as its national waters and sea bed for its
preferential or even exclusive use (aillarionov.livejournal.com/654847.html).
Obviously, these maps are not
definitive – the situation is far from completely resolved and the official delimitation
of the sea and its bed will require negotiation – but Moscow by its actions has
put itself in a position to demand recognition of these areas as its own. Given
the increasing sophistication of extractive industries, such claims are likely
to have serious economic consequences.
At the very least and even if Russia
does not occupy more of Ukraine, Ukraine will be deprived of an important
resource and Russia will gain one, yet another consequence of the Anschluss
that needs to be factored in by those seeking to understand or reverse what
Vladimir Putin has done.
No comments:
Post a Comment