Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 12 – When any
situation no matter how horrific continues for a long time, there is a great
danger that it will become for many a kind of new normal, something regrettable
but all too often ignored in the flood of events. That danger is now settling
over Russian-occupied Crimea where political persecutions are continuing
unabated.
On Friday in Kyiv, the Center for
Civic Freedoms and the SOS Euromaidan organization held a joint press
conference on the occasion of the release of its second monthly report about
repressions and political persecutions in Crimea. The picture is so horrific that it compels
attention (qha.com.ua/v-krimu-prodoljayutsya-politicheskie-presledovaniya-146204.html).
The participants at the meeting
included Mariya Lysenko, project coordinator at the Center for Civic Freedoms,
Stanislav Krasnov who has been persecuted in Crimea by the Russian occupiers,
and Roman Martynovsky, an expert of the Regional Center for Human Rights.
The QHA news
agency summed up their conclusions with the following words: “In Crimea it is
dangerous to be a Ukrainian. For such patriotism one can be fined in the best
case and put in prison in the worst.” Moreover, there are frequent cases of
kidnapping, beatings and torture. And informing on others has become “a norm of
life.”
And in the face of these disturbing
trends, the agency cited in conclusion Lysenko’s words that “we are unceasingly
calling for the dispatch of international observers to Crimea who could follow
the situation directly on the peninsula,” perhaps the only way that could
prevent the situation from becoming even worse.
Among the most troubling
developments of the last month, participants pointed to the following:
·
The
occupation authorities have expanded the authority of those informal groups who
support the regime to detain anyone who disagrees with the occupation.
·
The
occupiers continue to ban meetings and peaceful assemblies, such as one that
some in Crimea sought on June 28th, the Day of the Constitution of
Ukraine.
·
They
invent cases so as to be able to bring charges against those who took part in
earlier meetings that the authorities had given permission to take place.
·
The
occupation authorities allow appeals of convictions to give the appearance of “legality”
but then the superior courts simply return the cases to the courts of first instance
where no change in the outcome is likely.
·
The
Russian occupiers also continue to expand the list of people charged with
terrorism under an expanding definition of that term and then insist on the
detention of those so charged for extended periods, in effect punishing those
involved before any conviction.
No comments:
Post a Comment