Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 3 – Because they
are latecomers to a market economy and have not adjusted to it, Russians,
“however paradoxical it may seem,” feel themselves “more comfortable” now that
the situation is worse than they did when the economy was growing and the gap
between what they want and what they can have was greater, Mark Urnov says.
Citing the work of American
psychologist Richard Atkinson on the psychology of failure, Urnov, a political
scientist at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics, argues that “when the
situation in the country and the life of its citizens improve,” the
expectations of people increase even more (lenta.ru/articles/2015/08/02/zastoy/).
As
that happens, individuals begin to understand that they cannot achieve what
they want and then they get angry. But when the situation gets worse,” the gap
between “I want” and “I can” closes and the level of anger and aggression is
reduced. That has been true in Russia in the past, in 1998 and 2008, and it is
true now.
In
more developed countries, Urnov says, “people adequately assess their
possibilities and even in a favorable situation do not make unrealizable plans.
They thus achieve the goals they set and are satisfied with the results.
[Consequently,] the gap between ‘I want’ and ‘I can’ arises when a crisis
begins and the situation worsens,” just the reverse of the Russian pattern.
The
reason for this reaction by Russians lies in their “past experience.” They can
change in the future as they gain experience with the market, but that will
take time because “70 percent of Russians doubt their own abilities and in
crisis situations count on the state.” And that is made even worse by “a high
level of distrust of people in collective action.”
Any
protest begins “not only when things are bad for you but when the cause and
those responsible for your misfortunes are known.” Because of intense
propaganda, “the average Russian blames not the state or the authorities. They
see the cause of all their misfortunes in a foreign threat.”
As
a result, Urnov says, “the worsening of the situation works not toward the
confrontation of citizens and the state but to the population’s rallying around
the authorities against the foreign threat” -- especially given that Russians’
views about the crisis are shaped by television and televised propaganda.
At
the same time, he continues, even if the opposition were able to have free
access to make their case on television, that would “not mean that people would
go out into the street with political demands.” Instead, as now, people would
still focus on addressing their own problems by themselves or with the state’s
help rather than cooperating with others to press the state.
It
will take “at a minimum” two generations to change this pattern, the Moscow
scholar suggests, and in the meantime, many will be attracted to the
mythologized version of the period of stagnation at the end of Soviet
times. That is because they are too
young to have experienced it and yet hear from their elders that the situation
then was better than now.
No comments:
Post a Comment