Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 8 – The Russian authorities
want to ensure that they will not be
overthrown or replaced and consequently they naturally gravitate to and support
that part of society that is equally opposed to change, “the Village,” not as a
reality but “as a way of thought with its paternalism, traditionalism and
xenophobia,” Denis Dragunsky argues.
The Moscow commentator says that
what is going on now in Russia is first and foremost “a war of the village
worldview and style of life against the urban, a war of the community against the
personality, of tradition against innovation, of reaction against progress, of
custom against law, of distinctiveness and closed up conditions against
openness, and of mysticism and obscurantism against rationality” (gazeta.ru/comments/column/dragunsky/7874135.shtml).
“This
is a war not in the sense in which classical peasant wars in Europe and Russia
were but rather in a somewhat more abstract form in an ideological, values, and
even institutional sense,” he argues.
But
like earlier peasant wars, the current one, which has the support of the
authorities, has two sides. On the one hand, it reflects “a just protest
against the inhuman exploitation of the peasantry.” And on the other, “this is
a protest against modernization as such, against urban life” in the name of the
values of the village.
The
kind of exploitation to which the peasantry was subject in earlier centuries
ended “long ago,” Dragunsky continues, “but the hatred of the Village to the
City remains. This hatred [in fact] shifted from the village to the city and
infected many whose ancestors have already lived in urban areas for a long
time.”
Thus,
the Village war against urban values is not “about peasants as actual
personalities” but rather about those who continue to hold onto the values of
the village and see those values threatened by the city, even if they live in
it.
To
be sure, Dragunsky argues, “the Village and the peasant must be respected, but
they shouldn’t be fetishized” as things that are the source of all values
because they feed the rest of the population.
In fact, in any particular country and certainly in Russia, they don’t
feed the rest of the country: those who pump oil earn the money to buy food
from abroad.
Moreover,
the Moscow commentator points out, “the real village almost doesn’t remain in
Russia.” But while it is passing, “the
Village with a capital letter, that is village ideology and village
traditionalism and reaction very much remain.” Indeed, they may become even
stronger as those attached to these values feel them under threat.
The
reason for the current rise of the Village against the city is not hard to
identify, he says. Consider the following: “not one NATO soldier has arrested
or killed a single Russian (Soviet) man, while officers of the Cheka-NKVD-MGB
arrested millions and illegally shot no fewer than 800,000 of our fellow
citizens.”
But
“the overwhelming majority of compatriots hate and fear NATO – and trust (or as
the sociologists say, ‘are more inclined to trust than not to trust’) our
native repressive organs.” The key word
here is “native,” Dragunsky says, and it
is something that divides the village and village values from the city and
urban ones.
“For
the city, nothing is more curious, interesting or even desired than something
new, unfamiliar or foreign. For the village on the contrary there is nothing
more terrible and disgusting than something alien that is not ours. There are
no victims which the village will not bear ‘in order that everything will be as
it always was.’”
All
the achievements of urban civilization in Russia have not been able to root out
this “dark village worldview,” and it emerges when the authorities play to it
in order to stress their irreplaceability and permanence, values that the
Village likes but that urban residents are less attached to.
Without such support from the powers that be, “the
peasant war ends with the victory of the city;” but with that support, Village
values rapidly spread into the city and sometimes as now under the regime of
Vladimir Putin overwhelm urban ones with all the ensuing negative consequences,
Dragunsky writes.
No comments:
Post a Comment