Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 29 – The Moscow
urban agglomeration finds itself in a difficult situation: It is producing ever
more trash, has exhausted most of its landfill sites, and faces protests from
residents about plans to open new ones in the oblast. As a result, officials have turned to
neighboring oblasts asking to be allowed to build new dumps there.
Remarkably, the governor of one of
these, Igor Ruden of Tver, has refused, citing “ecological” concerns and likely
fearful of demonstrations like those which have erupted in Moscow Oblast and
also in neighboring Vladimir Oblast over trash disposal sites (rbc.ru/society/29/03/2018/5ab66ab59a79472dc950ea9b?from=main).
On the one hand, this is a small
thing: Tver isn’t objecting to the Russian government. It is shooting down the
proposal of a neighboring but powerful neighbor. But on the other, it is a potential turning
point not only because it is a reminder that oblasts matter but also because
their leaders can say “no” to others.
More immediately, it is a reminder
of a fundamental Russian problem: the failure to develop infrastructure the
population actually needs. And it further suggests the Moscow agglomeration may
soon be drowning in trash unless the center comes up with more money (novayagazeta.ru/news/2018/03/29/140590-vlasti-tverskoy-oblasti-otkazalis-stroit-musornye-poligony-dlya-othodov-iz-moskvy).
Some in the regions may consider
this a well-deserved payback for Moscow’s heavy-handedness; but if growing
cities often surrounded by increasingly vacant countryside in neighboring
districts can’t dispose of their trash, that will constitute not only a serious
health problem for residents but a political problem in both the cities and the
regions.
No comments:
Post a Comment