Paul Goble
Staunton,
February 18 – Were Belarus to become part of the Russian Federation, it would
likely have, at least for some extended period, a special status within that
new country, something that could have an impact very different from what the Kremlin
currently imagines, Aleksandr Razuvayev suggests.
It could
have the effect of leading to demands by at least some non-Russian republics
for an increase in their status to match what Belarus might have; and that
would have the effect of promoting a more federalist system than now and certainly
one far less like the new homogenous empire that Vladimir Putin appears to
want.
In a
commentary for Nezavisimaya gazeta,
the economist and financial analyst says that Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s
suggestion that the unification of Russia and Belarus could only be achieved by
referendum has consequences far greater than might appear at first glance (ng.ru/blogs/razuvaev/tatarstan-mozhet-poluchit-osobyy-status-v-soyuze-kak-i-belorussiya.php).
According to Razuvayev, “the times
of authoritarian empires such as the USSR or Romanov Russia, for example, have
passed. The prototype of the empire of the future apparently is the European
Union. Ideally, it has a single currency and a common foreign and defense
policy with the preservation of the statehood of the subjects included in the Union.”
To the extent that Belarus acquires
such status in a new Union state, he continues, other non-Russian (and
potentially predominantly ethnic Russian) areas “will be able to aspire” to
that enhanced status. Each of them could
become issuers of currency and collectors of taxes, something that would change
the Russian state fundamentally.
Such a model would be controversial and
opposed by many in Moscow; but, the economist says, it is probable that “this
is the best choice for the integration of the entire post-Soviet space.” In
short, if Moscow wants to expand its influence over the former union republics,
it is going to have to concede more powers to the federal subjects within its
current borders.
Under such an approach, Razuvayev
continues, “the Russian Federation would be able to offer its partners a unique
product – security and sovereignty. Russia is the only country which has
military parity with the US and NATO;” and the West views Russia and the other
post-Soviet states primarily as a source of raw materials and cheap labor.
Changing the relations of the
post-Soviet states with each other could set the stage for changing the latter;
but such changes will almost certainly require changing the way Moscow deals
with its federal units, Tatarstan in the first instance but other non-Russian
and even Rusian ones as well.
If Moscow refused to give Belarus and these federal subjects greater status, it would not only make it even less likely that Belarus would agree to join the Russian Federation but it would make it almost impossible for Moscow to hope to integrate the former Soviet space under its leadership and thus make the achievement of one of Putin's most passionately held goals highly unlikely.
No comments:
Post a Comment