Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 9 – Vladimir Putin’s
decision to allow foreigners to serve in the Russian military not only reflects
Russia’s demographic problems and his desire to rope in more people from the
former Soviet republics but also and perhaps more important is part of his
ongoing effort to hide Russian combat losses from the Russian people.
To the extent that the Kremlin
leader succeeds, that will make his use of force abroad even more likely
because it will remove one of the last constraints, admittedly already a weak
one, on his actions -- the feelings of the Russian people about the losses of
their husbands and sons in Putin’s foreign adventures.
One way Moscow has used to hide
military losses is to simply lie about them. That is what many Russians appear
to assume given the readiness of the Kremlin to disown those who are captured (babr24.com/msk/?IDE=165889, graniru.org/opinion/milshtein/m.264448.html
and polit.ru/article/2017/10/05/syr/).
Another related technique is to employ a
wide variety of mercenary groups whose subordination to the Russian military command
can be plausibly denied (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=59D6208A93A07).
But neither of these tactics have stopped Russians from asking how many of
their own have died in Syria?
In today’s Novaya gazeta, Irek Murtazin addresses that question and says that
Russian experts tell him that the numbers Russians have been given, a few dozen
or even less, are implausible on their face, given the losses one would expect
in any military operation of this size (novayagazeta.ru/articles/2017/10/09/74125-ih-prosto-net).
He discusses in detail the Vagner group, a
mercenary outfit which the Russian defense ministry doesn’t take responsibility
for and thus whose losses, although they are very much part of the Russian
effort, are things the Russian military isn’t going to feel any responsibility
for reporting.
According to Murtazin, there is a debate
within the Russian defense establishment as to whether the Vagner forces should
be legalized as part of the Russian military, something a 2015 law allows
for. Opponents of doing that include a
deputy defense minister and the FSB’s military counter-intelligence branch. Backers
are led by the head of the Main Intelligence Administration of the General
Staff.
While this is being sorted out, Russian
losses will continue to mount, “hybrid” losses as it were in yet another “hybrid”
war. It seems likely that Putin will use any foreigners who join the Russian
military in a similar way, giving him the kind of deniability of responsibility
he has used since “the polite little green men” went into Crimea.
No comments:
Post a Comment