Paul Goble
Staunton,
February 4 – Snow hits almost all Russian cities hard, sociologist Aleksey
Roshchin says; but Moscow alone among them has the capacity to remove it in a
timely fashion. Muscovites are by their nature upset that things aren’t even
better for them, forgetting that their complaints only highlight how much
better they have it.
Some
sycophants say it is all because of their wonderful mayor; others say that it
is because Moscow has to be a showcase for the country to foreigners; but few
in the capital admit what is in fact the case: Moscow has far more money per
capita than do other Russian cities (newizv.ru/news/politics/04-02-2019/umnaya-moskva-i-glupaya-rossiya-pochemu-ob-uspehah-stolitsy-luchshe-molchat).
Probably,
Roshchin says, no one elsewhere would object if Moscow received “20 to 30
percent” more, but they are increasingly angry that the capital gets several orders
of magnitude more, that they are sending their taxes to the city, and that
Moscow is sending them back not only less money for basic services but its
trash.
And
that pattern, he continues, highlights an increasingly inconvenient reality:
because the center takes so much from the regions and gives back so little, “Russia
can allow itself only one city with a NORMAL city budget.” That is Moscow, and everyone
elsewhere, even in St. Petersburg, has to make do with something less.
Snow
removal may seem like a small thing, Roschin says; but when one city gets the
chance to do it more or less right and no other city or town in the country
does, that makes people in the latter angry and carries with it for the one
city that benefits “no small political risks.”
No comments:
Post a Comment