Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 23 – In yet another
Putin-era tilt to major Russian corporations and against non-Russian groups,
officials have allowed fishing corporations to begin their seasonal catch on
the Amur and in the shore waters of the Sea of Okhotsk a week ahead of
fishermen from the numerically small peoples of the North and Far East.
Both will see their seasons end on
the same day; and this means, activists say, that the corporations will easily
fulfill their quotas and making a profit while the local people, who from times
immemorial have depended on their catch, will have difficulty in filling theirs
and thus face difficulties in feeding themselves in the coming months (sibreal.org/a/30681113.html).
This follows government manipulation
of the quotas for members of the numerically small peoples who are supposed to
enjoy special protections according to Russian law. Their longstanding quota of
100 kilograms of fish per family was cut to 50 and then 25. The 100-kilogram
quota was restored this year, but many have trouble meeting it given corporate
fishing.
Elena Konoplyanko, head of the Soviet-Gavan
district organization of the representatives of the indigenous numerically
small peoples says that officials treat members of her communities “like
animals in a zoo,” doling out just as little food as they think they can get
away with while allowing Russian firms to profit.
Russian officials have restricted
the catch of the native peoples in many ways. They have further bureaucratized
the complicated application process of approval of fishing rights. They have
limited the size of nets and lines the peoples can use. And they have imposed
new controls because they say many outsiders are falsely declaring they are
members of these groups (toz.su/newspaper/podrobnosti/pod_maskoy_korennykh_malykh_narodnostey_severa_deystvuyut_brakonery/).
All this works against the native
peoples, Konoplyanko says. Many are
angry but often do not know what to do. If they try to fish in traditional ways
for traditional harvests, they are harassed or even arrested. And because some
do not know their rights, they often avoid steps that might allow them to
defend themselves.
But now at least some of them see
they have one recourse. Konolyanko notes that people ask her how is she going
to vote on the Constitutional amendments next week. Given that the powers seem unwilling
to respect the rights of her communities now, she and presumably others see
little reason to change a document that means so little.
No comments:
Post a Comment